Telehealth in the rehabilitation of female pelvic floor dysfunction: a systematic literature review.

Autor: da Mata KRU; Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil., Costa RCM; Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil., Carbone ÉDSM; Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 608 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CED 04024-002, Brazil., Gimenez MM; Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 608 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CED 04024-002, Brazil., Bortolini MAT; Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 608 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CED 04024-002, Brazil., Castro RA; Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 608 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CED 04024-002, Brazil., Fitz FF; Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. fanifitz@yahoo.com.br.; Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 608 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, CED 04024-002, Brazil. fanifitz@yahoo.com.br.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: International urogynecology journal [Int Urogynecol J] 2021 Feb; Vol. 32 (2), pp. 249-259. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Nov 11.
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04588-8
Abstrakt: Introduction and Hypothesis: The pandemic caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) increased the awareness and efforts to provide care from distance using information technologies. We reviewed the literature about the practice and effectiveness of the rehabilitation of the female pelvic floor dysfunction via telehealth regarding symptomatology and quality of life and function of pelvic floor muscles (PFM).
Methods: A bibliographic review was carried out in May 2020 in the databases: Embase, Medline/PubMed, LILACS and PEDro. A total of 705 articles were reviewed after the removal of duplicates. The methodological quality of the articles was evaluated by the PEDro scale. Two authors performed data extraction into a standardized spreadsheet.
Results: Four studies were included, two being randomized controlled trials. Among the RCTs, only one compared telehealth with face-to-face treatment; the second one compared telehealth with postal treatment. The other two studies are follow-up and cost analysis reports on telehealth versus postal evaluation. Data showed that women who received the intervention remotely presented significant improvement in their symptoms, such as reducing the number of incontinence episodes and voiding frequency, improving PFM strength and improving quality of life compared to women who had the face-to-face treatment.
Conclusions: Telehealth promoted a significant improvement in urinary symptoms, PFM function and quality of life. Telehealth is still emerging, and more studies are needed to draw more conclusions. The recommendations of the governmental authorities, physical therapy councils and corresponding associations of each country also need to be considered.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: