Objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures.

Autor: Rahimi F; Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bonab, 5551761167, Bonab, East Azerbaijan, Iran. frahimi@ubonab.ac.ir., Eyvazpour R; Department of Electronics, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran., Salahshour N; Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bonab, 5551761167, Bonab, East Azerbaijan, Iran., Azghani MR; Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Biomedical engineering online [Biomed Eng Online] 2020 Nov 09; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 82. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Nov 09.
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-00826-8
Abstrakt: Background: Instrumented pendulum test is an objective and repeatable biomechanical method of assessment for spasticity. However, multitude of sensor technologies and plenty of suggested outcome measures, confuse those interested in implementing this method in practice. Lack of a standard agreement on the definition of experimental setup and outcome measures adds to this ambiguity and causes the results of one study not to be directly attainable by a group that uses a different setup. In this systematic review of studies, we aim to reduce the confusion by providing pros and cons of the available choices, and also by standardizing the definitions.
Methods: A literature search was conducted for the period of 1950 to the end of 2019 on PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and IEEE explore; with keywords of "pendulum test" and "Spasticity".
Results: Twenty-eight studies with instrumented pendulum test for assessment of spasticity met the inclusion criteria. All the suggested methods of implementation were compared and advantages and disadvantages were provided for each sensor technology. An exhaustive list categorized outcome measures in three groups of angle-based, angular velocity-based, and angular acceleration-based measures with all different names and definitions.
Conclusions: With the aim of providing standardized methodology with replicable and comparable results, sources of dissimilarity and ambiguity among research strategies were found and explained with the help of graphical representation of pendulum movement stages and corresponding parameters on the angular waveforms. We hope using the provided tables simplify the choices when implementing pendulum test for spasticity evaluation, improve the consistency when reporting the results, and disambiguate inconsistency in the literature.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje