| Autor: |
Ræder BW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust., Stake IK; Kalnes Hospital, Østfold Hospital Trust., Madsen JE; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital.; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo., Frihagen F; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital., Jacobsen SB; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo., Andersen MR; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust.; Aleris Hospital, Tromsø, Norway., Figved W; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Acta orthopaedica [Acta Orthop] 2020 Dec; Vol. 91 (6), pp. 770-775. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 10. |
| DOI: |
10.1080/17453674.2020.1818175 |
| Abstrakt: |
Background and purpose - Better outcomes are reported for suture button (SB) compared with syndesmotic screws (SS) in patients treated for an acute ankle syndesmotic injury. One reason could be that screws are more rigid than an SB. A single tricortical 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw (TS) is the most dynamic screw option. Our hypothesis is that 1 SB and 1 TS provide similar results. Therefore, in randomized controlled trial, we compared the results between SB and TS for syndesmotic stabilization in patients with acute syndesmosis injury. Patients and methods - 113 patients with acute syndesmotic injury were randomized to SB (n = 55) or TS (n = 58). The American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Olerud-Molander Ankle score (OMA), visual analogue scale (VAS), EuroQol- 5D (EQ-5D), radiologic results, range of motion, complications, and reoperations (no implants were routinely removed). CT scans of both ankles were obtained after surgery, and after 1 and 2 years. Results - The 2-year follow-up rate was 84%. At 2 years, median AOFAS score was 97 in both groups (IQR SB 87-100, IQR TS 90-100, p = 0.7), median MOXFQ index was 5 in the SB group and 3 in the TS group (IQR 0-18 vs. 0-8, p = 0.2), and median OMA score was 90 in the SB group and 100 in the TS group (IQR 75-100 vs. 83-100, p = 0.2). The syndesmotic reduction was similar 2 years after surgery; 19/55 patients in the SB group and 13/58 in the TS group had a difference in anterior syndesmotic width ≥ 2 mm (p = 0.3). 0 patients in the SB group and 5 patients in the TS group had complete tibiofibular synostosis (p = 0.03). At 2 years, 10 TS were broken. Complications and reoperations were similar between the groups. Interpretation - We found no clinically relevant differences regarding outcome scores between the groups. TS is an inexpensive alternative to SB. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|
