Requirements for the spatial storage effect are weakly evident for common species in natural annual plant assemblages.

Autor: Towers IR; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia., Bowler CH; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia., Mayfield MM; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia., Dwyer JM; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Ecology [Ecology] 2020 Dec; Vol. 101 (12), pp. e03185. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 07.
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3185
Abstrakt: Coexistence in spatially varying environments is theorized to be promoted by a variety of mechanisms including the spatial storage effect. The spatial storage effect promotes coexistence when (1) species have unique vital rate responses to their spatial environment and, when abundant, (2) experience stronger competition in the environmental patches where they perform better. In a naturally occurring southwest Western Australian annual plant system, we conducted a neighbor removal experiment involving eleven focal species growing in high-abundance populations. Specifically, we measured species' fecundity across a variety of environmental gradients in both the presence and absence of neighbors. For the environmental variables that we measured, there was only limited evidence for species-specific responses to the environment, with a composite variable describing overstory cover and leaf litter cover being the best predictor of fecundity for a subset of focal species. In addition, although we found strong evidence for intraspecific competition, positive environment-competition covariance was only detected for one species. Thus, positive environment-competition covariance may not be as common as expected in populations of species growing at high abundance, at least when tested in natural assemblages. Our findings highlight the inherent limitations of using natural assemblages to study spatial coexistence mechanisms, and we urge empirical ecologists to take these limitations into account when designing future experiments.
(© 2020 by the Ecological Society of America.)
Databáze: MEDLINE