Rehabilitation Variability After Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
Autor: | Lightsey HM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA., Trofa DP; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA., Sonnenfeld JJ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA., Swindell HW; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA., Makhni EC; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA., Ahmad CS; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine [Orthop J Sports Med] 2019 Mar 25; Vol. 7 (3), pp. 2325967119833363. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Mar 25 (Print Publication: 2019). |
DOI: | 10.1177/2325967119833363 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Investigations specifically delineating the safest and most efficacious components of physical therapy after ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction of the elbow are lacking. As such, while a number of recommendations regarding postoperative therapy have been published, no validated rehabilitation guidelines currently exist. Purpose: To assess the variability of rehabilitation protocols utilized by orthopaedic residency programs in the United States (US) and those described in the scientific literature. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Online UCL reconstruction rehabilitation protocols from US orthopaedic programs and from the scientific literature were reviewed. A comprehensive scoring rubric was developed to assess each protocol for the presence of various rehabilitation components as well as the timing of their introduction. Results: Overall, 22 protocols (14%) from 155 US Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) orthopaedic programs and 8 protocols published in the scientific literature detailing UCL reconstruction postoperative rehabilitation were identified and reviewed. After reconstruction, the majority of ERAS and review article protocols (77% and 88%, respectively) advised immediate splinting at 90° of elbow flexion. The mean time to splint discontinuation across all protocols was 2.0 weeks (range, 1-3 weeks). There was considerable variability in elbow range of motion recommendations; however, most protocols detailed goals for full extension and full flexion (>130°) at a mean 5.3 weeks (range, 4-6 weeks) and 5.5 weeks (range, 4-6 weeks), respectively. Significant diversity in the inclusion and timing of strengthening, proprioceptive, and throwing exercises was also apparent. Thirteen ERAS (59%) and 7 review article (88%) protocols specifically mentioned return to competition as an endpoint. ERAS protocols permitted return to competition significantly earlier than review article protocols (29.6 vs 39.0 weeks, respectively; P = .042). Conclusion: There is notable variability in both the composition and timing of rehabilitation components across a small number of protocols available online. While our understanding of postoperative rehabilitation for UCL reconstruction evolves, outcome-based studies focused on identifying clinically beneficial modalities and metrics are necessary to enable meaningful standardization. Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: E.C.M. has received educational support from Pinnacle and Smith & Nephew, consulting fees from Smith & Nephew, and hospitality payments from Smith & Nephew and Stryker. C.S.A. has received consulting fees from Arthrex, speaking fees from Arthrex, royalties from Arthrex, and hospitality payments from DePuy. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |