| Autor: |
Payler SJ; 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK., Mirmalek Z; 2 Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.; 3 BAER Institute, Moffett Field, California, USA., Hughes SS; 4 Department of Geosciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, USA., Kobs Nawotniak SE; 4 Department of Geosciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, USA., Brady AL; 5 School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada., Stevens AH; 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK., Cockell CS; 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK., Lim DSS; 3 BAER Institute, Moffett Field, California, USA.; 6 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
During the BASALT research program, real (nonsimulated) geological and biological science was accomplished through a series of extravehicular activities (EVAs) under simulated Mars mission conditions. These EVAs were supported by a Mission Support Center (MSC) that included an on-site, colocated Science Support Team (SST). The SST was composed of scientists from a variety of disciplines and operations researchers who provided scientific and technical expertise to the crew while each EVA was being conducted (intra-EVA). SST management and organization developed under operational conditions that included Mars-like communication latencies, bandwidth constraints, and EVA plans that were infused with Mars analog field science objectives. This paper focuses on the SST workspace considerations such as science team roles, physical layout, communication interactions, operational techniques, and work support technology. Over the course of BASALT field deployments to Idaho and Hawai'i, the SST team made several changes of note to increase both productivity and efficiency. For example, new roles were added for more effective management of technical discussions, and the layout of the SST workspace evolved multiple times during the deployments. SST members' reflexive adjustments resulted in a layout that prioritized face-to-face discussions over face-to-data displays, highlighting the importance of interpersonal communication during SST decision-making. In tandem with these workspace adjustments, a range of operational techniques were developed to help the SST manage discussions and information flow under time pressure. |
