| Autor: |
Harris AHS; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.; Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA., Meerwijk EL; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA., Kamal RN; Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA., Sears ED; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA., Hawn M; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.; Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA., Eisenberg D; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.; Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA., Finlay AK; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA., Hagedorn H; Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, MN, USA.; University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, USA., Marshall N; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA., Mudumbai SC; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.; Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) can be performed with a variety of anesthesia techniques. General anesthesia is associated with higher risk profile and increased resource utilization, suggesting it should not be routinely used for CTR. The purpose of this study was to examine the patient factors associated with surgeons' requests for general anesthesia for CTR and the frequency of routine use of general anesthesia by Veterans Health Administration (VHA) surgeons and facilities. Methods: National VHA data for fiscal years 2015 and 2017 were used to identify patients receiving CTR. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to evaluate patient, procedure, and surgeon factors associated with requests by the surgeon for general anesthesia versus other anesthesia techniques. Results: In all, 18 145 patients underwent CTR performed by 780 surgeons in 113 VHA facilities. Overall, there were 2218 (12.2%) requests for general anesthesia. Although some patient (eg, older age, obesity), procedure (eg, open vs endoscopic), and surgeon (eg, higher volume) factors were associated with lower odds of requests for general anesthesia, there was substantial facility- and surgeon-level variability. The percentage of patients with general anesthesia requested ranged from 0% to 100% across surgeons. Three facilities and 28 surgeons who performed at least 5 CTRs requested general anesthesia for more than 75% of patients. Conclusions: Where CTR is performed and by whom appear to influence requests for general anesthesia more than patient factors in this study. Avoidance of routine use of general anesthesia for CTR should be considered in future clinical practice guidelines and quality measures. |
