Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline.

Autor:	Stevens PM; PHILLIP M. STEVENS MEd, CPO, is affiliated with the Hanger Clinic, Salt Lake City, Utah.; SHANE R. WURDEMAN, PhD, MSPO, CP, is affiliated with the Hanger Clinic, Salt Lake City, Utah., Wurdeman SR; PHILLIP M. STEVENS MEd, CPO, is affiliated with the Hanger Clinic, Salt Lake City, Utah.; SHANE R. WURDEMAN, PhD, MSPO, CP, is affiliated with the Hanger Clinic, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO [J Prosthet Orthot] 2019 Jan; Vol. 31 (1), pp. 2-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Nov 09.
DOI:	10.1097/JPO.0000000000000214
Abstrakt:	Introduction: This guideline was developed to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on prosthetic knee selection for unilateral amputation at the knee disarticulation or transfemoral level. Methods: The guideline is based upon the best available evidence as it relates to prosthetic knee selection after unilateral knee disarticulation or transfemoral amputation. Recommendations are drawn from systematic review, meta-analysis, and additional published practice guidelines. Results: Recommendation 1. Fluid knee benefits and indications: Knees with hydraulic or pneumatic swing resistance are indicated for active walkers, permitting increased walking comfort, speed, and symmetry.Recommendation 2. Microprocessor knee benefits: Compared with nonmicroprocessor knees:a) With respect to self-report indices and measures, microprocessor knees are indicated to reduce stumbles, falls, and associated frustrations as well as the cognitive demands of ambulation.b) With respect to self-report indices and measures, microprocessor knees are indicated to increase confidence while walking, self-reported mobility, satisfaction, well-being, and quality of life.c) With respect to physical performance indices and measures, microprocessor knees are indicated to increase self-selected walking speed, walking speed on uneven terrain, and metabolic efficiency during gait.Recommendation 3. Microprocessor knee equivalence: Given the comparable values observed with the use of microprocessor and nonmicroprocessor knees with regard to daily step counts, temporal and spatial gait symmetry, self-reported general health, and total costs of prosthetic rehabilitation, these parameters may not be primary indications in prosthetic knee joint selection.Recommendation 4. Microprocessor knees for limited community ambulators: Among limited community ambulators, microprocessor knees are indicated to enable increases in level ground walking speed and walking speed on uneven terrain while substantially reducing uncontrolled falls and increasing both measured and perceived balance. Conclusions: These clinical practice guidelines summarize the available evidence related to prosthetic knee selection for individuals with unilateral knee disarticulation or transfemoral amputation. The noted clinical practice guidelines are meant to serve on as "guides." They may not apply to all patients and clinical situations.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu