GPs' patterns of clinical assessment when faced with a patient suspected for spondyloarthritis: a prospective educational intervention study.

Autor:	van Onna M; Rheumatologist, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, and School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands., Gorter S; Rheumatologist, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, and School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands., Maiburg B; GP, Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands., Waagenaar G; GP, Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands., van Tubergen A; Rheumatologist, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, and School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	BJGP open [BJGP Open] 2017 Jan 09; Vol. 1 (1), pp. bjgpopen17X100689. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jan 09.
DOI:	10.3399/bjgpopen17X100689
Abstrakt:	Background: Timely recognition and referral of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) is challenging due to the frequent unawareness of the clinical picture. Aim: To identify clinical assessment patterns of GPs and GP-residents when facing a patient suspected of having SpA, and to determine which components of clinical assessment were most prevalent prior to referral to the rheumatologist and whether targeted education could positively influence pattern recognition. Design & Setting: Prospective multicentre educational intervention study in primary care practices in the Netherlands. Method: GPs and GP-residents were visited in two rounds by standardised patients (SPs) simulating axial or peripheral SpA (dactylitis). Between these rounds, an educational intervention regarding SpA took place for part of the participants. SPs completed a case-specific checklist inquiring about disease-related items and items on physical examination. Results: Sixty-eight participants (30 GPs and 38 GP-residents) were included and 19 (28%) received the educational intervention. In round 1, about half of the participants asked at least one question to differentiate between an inflammatory or mechanical origin of the back pain or peripheral complaint; on average, <15% asked for extra-articular manifestations. After education, GP-residents inquired more about the presence of extra-articular manifestations and family history of axial SpA; this pattern was also observed in the GPs and GP-residents who correctly referred the SP. In the peripheral SpA case, the observed gain was less evident when compared to the axial SpA case. Conclusion: Pattern recognition of patients suspected for SpA by GP(-residents) is essential for referral to a rheumatologist and can be improved by education. Competing Interests: MO: has received consultancy and speaker fees from Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, Novartis and UCB. SG: has received speaker fees from UCB. AT: has received speaker’s fees from MSD, Janssen-Cilag, consultancy fees from Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis and an unrestricted research grant from Pfizer, MSD, Abbvie, Jansen-Cilag, Celgene, UCB. The other authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu