| Autor: |
van der Molen HF; Amsterdam UMC, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.f.vandermolen@amc.nl., de Groene GJ; Amsterdam UMC, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. g.j.degroene@amc.uva.nl., Hulshof CTJ; Amsterdam UMC, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.t.hulshof@amc.uva.nl., Frings-Dresen MHW; Amsterdam UMC, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.frings@amc.nl. |
| Abstrakt: |
To support occupational physicians in their assessment and notification of occupational diseases, diagnostic registration guidelines are developed with information about associations between work-related risk factors and diseases. The objective of this review of systematic reviews is to examine whether work-related risk factors are associated with chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD). We searched the electronic database of Medline for systematic reviews published between 1 January 2009 and 20 June 2017. Reviews were included when COPD was assessed by data on lung function and when work-related exposures to vapors, dusts, gases, or fumes (VDGF) were described. One author selected studies and extracted data; two authors assessed study quality using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). In all eight systematic reviews included, various exposures to vapors, dusts, gases, and fumes (VGDF) at work are associated with COPD. Two-thirds of the included studies are cross-sectional and show a high heterogeneity in population, setting, and mostly self-reported-exposures. Two high-quality reviews (AMSTAR score ≥ 9) including meta-analyses show associations and excess risk of COPD for work-related general exposure to VDGF with a summary odds ratio of 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19⁻1.73) and to inorganic dust with a mean difference in predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) of -5.7% (95% CI: -8.62% to -2.71%). Exposure to VGDF at work is associated with a small but increased risk of COPD. More detailed workplace measurements of specific VGDF are warranted to gain an insight into dose⁻response relationships. |
