The Influence of Patient Exposure to Breast Reconstruction Approaches and Education on Patient Choices in Breast Cancer Treatment.
Autor: | Dobke MK; From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA., Yee B; From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA., Mackert GA; Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center, Ludwigshafen, Germany., Zhu WY; From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA., Blair SL; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Annals of plastic surgery [Ann Plast Surg] 2019 Aug; Vol. 83 (2), pp. 206-210. |
DOI: | 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001661 |
Abstrakt: | Background: The landscape of surgical and medical management and patient choices for breast cancer treatment changes as breast reconstruction and oncoplastic approaches improve and diversify. Increased access to breast reconstruction, in addition to patient education, influences the breast cancer patient. Therefore, the examination of the possible impact of reconstructive surgery on all stages of the breast cancer management per se seemed timely. Methods: Plastic surgery consults were arranged for 520 new patients diagnosed with breast cancer (2012-2016) including patients with noninvasive breast cancer but at high risk of further cancer development. To test the plastic surgery impact on patient choices regarding the management of the cancer, a subset of 90 patients was identified to test the plastic surgery impact on patient choices. These patients were referred to plastic surgery, following the first round of consultations by surgical and medical oncologists with only the preliminary oncological management plan defined. After a plastic surgery consultation, but prior to finalization of the overall oncological management plan, they were surveyed on the subject of modification of their personal choices and requests pertaining to their cancer management. Results: In this subset of 90 patients 40 (44%) returned to their surgical or medical oncologist considering changes of the primary management plan after their plastic surgery consultation. Twenty-six (28%) ultimately altered their plan, and the following patient-driven changes were made: mastectomy as opposed to lumpectomy (18 patients [20%]), contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (11 patients [12%]), nipple/areola removal as opposed to nipple/areola sparing suggested by the oncologists (5 patients [6%]), oncoplastic breast reduction as part of lumpectomy (5 patients [6%]), and other modifications (3 patients [3%]). Conclusions: Decisions for altering the preliminary oncologic plan or choosing a specific alternative (eg, lumpectomy plus radiation vs mastectomy) resulted from patient education on (1) reconstructive options, (2) aesthetic pitfalls and results. and (3) their interfacing with the oncological outcomes. Ultimately, plastic surgeons influence the multispecialty breast cancer management and patient decision-making process. Therefore, oncological literacy for plastic surgeons is essential to provide state-of-the-art breast cancer care and avoidance of suboptimal patient decisions. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |