Concurrent Training with Blood Flow Restriction does not Decrease Inflammatory Markers.

Autor:	de Souza TMF; Faculty of Physical Education, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil., Libardi CA; Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos - UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil., Cavaglieri CR; Faculty of Physical Education, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil., Gáspari AF; Faculty of Physical Education, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil., Brunelli DT; Faculty of Physical Education, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil., de Souza GV; Faculty of Physical Education, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil., Ugrinowitsch C; School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, USP, São Paulo, Brazil., Min Li L; Department of Neurology, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil., Chacon-Mikahil MPT; Faculty of Physical Education, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	International journal of sports medicine [Int J Sports Med] 2018 Jan; Vol. 39 (1), pp. 29-36. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Nov 09.
DOI:	10.1055/s-0043-119222
Abstrakt:	The aging process is associated with several changes in the elderly such as the decrease in cardiorespiratory fitness, strength and muscle mass, in addition to chronic low-grade inflammation. Concurrent training with blood flow restriction can be an interesting alternative to improve functional capacity with low mechanical stress in the elderly. The purpose of this study was to compare the inflammatory effects in older individuals submitted to two different protocols of concurrent training. Twenty-two healthy older adults (63.7±3.8 years; 69.8±8.9 kg; 1.6±0.1 m) performed 12 weeks of concurrent training (CT) or concurrent training with blood flow restriction (CTBFR) and the effects on inflammatory markers were analyzed. We found inflammatory behavior for the CTBFR group with a significant difference in serum concentration of C-reactive protein between pre- and post-moment (0.96±0.37 to 1.71±1.45, p=0.049), with no difference between groups, and a time effect in interleukin-6 (pre=0.86±0.43; post=1.02±0.46, p=0.016). We conclude that the CTBFR showed a pro-inflammatory profile after the period of intervention whereas the CT showed the opposite. Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu