| Autor: |
Navarro TP; Federal University of Minas Gerais, Panamerican Circulation Institute, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil;, Bernardes Rde C; Madre Teresa Hospital Aortic Center, Panamerican Circulation Institute, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; and., Procopio RJ; Federal University of Minas Gerais, Panamerican Circulation Institute, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil;, Leite JO; Federal University of Minas Gerais, Panamerican Circulation Institute, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil;, Dardik A; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Aorta (Stamford, Conn.) [Aorta (Stamford)] 2014 Feb 01; Vol. 2 (1), pp. 28-36. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Feb 01 (Print Publication: 2014). |
| DOI: |
10.12945/j.aorta.2014.13-030 |
| Abstrakt: |
Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a therapy that continues to evolve rapidly as advances in technology are incorporated into new generations of devices and surgical practice. Although EVAR has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for patients with favorable anatomy, treatment of patients with unfavorable anatomy remains controversial and is still an off-label indication for endovascular treatment with some current stent-grafts. The proximal neck of the aneurysm remains the most hostile anatomic barrier to successful endovascular repair with long-term durability. Open surgery for unfavorable necks is still considered the gold standard treatment in contemporary practice, despite the increased mortality and morbidity attributed to suprarenal cross-clamping, particularly in high-risk patients. Evolving technology may overcome the obstacles preventing endovascular treatment of unfavorable proximal neck anatomy; current approaches include purely endovascular as well as hybrid approaches, and generally include strategies that either extend the length of the short neck, move the proximal neck more proximally, or keep the short neck intact. These approaches include the use of debranching techniques, banding, chimneys, fenestrated and branched devices, filling the sac with endobags, endoanchors, and other novel devices. These newer-generation devices appear to have promising short- and midterm results. However, lack of good evidence of efficacy with long-term results for these newer approaches still precludes wide dissemination of endovascular solutions for the hostile proximal neck. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
