The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review.

Autor:	Hew M; Department of Allergy Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Corcoran JP; Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK., Harriss EK; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK., Rahman NM; Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK., Mallett S; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2015 May 19; Vol. 5 (5), pp. e007838. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 May 19.
DOI:	10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007838
Abstrakt:	Objectives: (1) Summarise chest ultrasound accuracy to diagnose radiological consolidation, referenced to chest CT in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). (2) Directly compared ultrasound with chest X-ray. Setting: Hospitalised patients. Participants: Studies were eligible if adult participants in respiratory failure underwent chest ultrasound to diagnose consolidation referenced to CT. Exclusion: (1) not primary study, (2) not respiratory failure, (3) not chest ultrasound, (4) not consolidation, (5) translation unobtainable, (6) unable to extract data, (7) unable to obtain paper. 4 studies comprising 224 participants met inclusion. Outcome Measures: As planned, paired forest plots display 95% CIs of sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound and chest X-ray. Sensitivity and specificity from each study are plotted in receiver operator characteristics space. Meta-analysis was planned if studies were sufficiently homogeneous and numerous (≥4). Although this numerical requirement was met, meta-analysis was prevented by heterogeneous units of analysis between studies. Results: All studies were in intensive care, with either a high risk of selection bias or high applicability concerns. Studies had unclear or high risk of bias related to use of ultrasound. Only 1 study clearly performed ultrasound within 24 h of respiratory failure diagnosis. Ultrasound sensitivity ranged from 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97) to 1.00 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.00). Specificity ranged from 0.78 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.94) to 1.00 (0.99 to 1.00). In two studies, chest X-ray had lower sensitivity than ultrasound, but there were insufficient patients to compare specificity. Conclusions: Four small studies suggest ultrasound is highly sensitive and specific for consolidation in ARF, but high risk of bias and concerns about applicability in all studies may have inflated diagnostic accuracy. Further robustly designed studies are needed to define the role of ultrasound in this setting. Trial Registration Number: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (CRD42013006472). (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu