Legal briefing: informed consent in the clinical context.

Autor:	Pope TM; Health Law Institute, Hamline University School of Law, MS-D2017, 1536 Hewitt Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237 USA, tpope-1@hamline.edu., Hexum M; Hamline University School of Law, Saint Paul, MN USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	The Journal of clinical ethics [J Clin Ethics] 2014 Summer; Vol. 25 (2), pp. 152-75.
Abstrakt:	This issue's "Legal Briefing" column covers recent legal developments involving informed consent.1 We covered this topic in previous articles in The Journal of Clinical Ethics.2 But an updated discussion is warranted. First, informed consent remains a central and critically important issue in clinical ethics. Second, there have been numerous significant legal changes over the past year. We categorize recent legal developments into the following 13 categories: (1) Medical Malpractice Liability, (2) Medical Malpractice Liability in Wisconsin, (3) Medical Malpractice Liability in Novel Situations, (4) Enforcement by Criminal Prosecutors, (5) Enforcement by State Medical Boards, (6) Enforcement through Anti-Discrimination Laws, (7) Statutorily Mandated Disclosures Related to End-of-Life Counseling, (8) Statutorily Mandated Disclosures Related to Aid in Dying, (9) Statutorily Mandated Disclosures Related to Abortion, (10) Statutorily Mandated Disclosures Related to Telemedicine, (11) Statutorily Mandated Disclosures Related to Other Interventions, (12) Statutorily Mandated Gag and Censorship Laws, (13) Informed Consent in the Research Context. (Copyright 2014 The Journal of Clinical Ethics. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu