Influence of different methods of cleaning custom bases on the shear bond strength of indirectly bonded brackets.

Autor:	Kanashiro LK; Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil., Robles-Ruíz JJ; Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil., Ciamponi AL; Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil., Medeiros IS; Department of Biomaterials and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil., Tortamano A; Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil., Paiva JB; Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of orthodontics [J Orthod] 2014 Sep; Vol. 41 (3), pp. 175-80. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Feb 13.
DOI:	10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000090
Abstrakt:	Objective: To determine the influence on shear bond strength and bond failure location of four cleaning methods for orthodontic bracket custom bases. Design: In vitro laboratory study. Material and Methods: Eighty bovine teeth were divided at random into four groups. The bracket custom bases were cleaned with different methods: group 1 with methyl methacrylate monomer, group 2 with acetone, group 3 with 50 μm aluminium oxide particles and group 4 with detergent. The brackets were indirectly bonded onto the teeth with the Sondhi Rapid-Set self-curing adhesive. The maximum required shear bond strength to debond the brackets was recorded. The bond failure location was evaluated using the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis (P<0·05) was used to detect significant differences in the bond strength. Kaplan-Meier survival plots and log-rank test were done to compare the survival distribution between the groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test (P<0·05) was used to evaluate the differences in the ARI scores. Results: The mean bond strengths in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 23·7±5·0, 25·3±5·1, 25·6±3·7 and 25·7±4·2 MPa, respectively. There were no significant statistically differences in either the bond strength or the ARI score between the groups. Conclusion: The four custom base-cleaning methods presented the same efficiencies on indirect bond of the brackets; thus, practitioners can choose the method that works best for them. (© 2014 British Orthodontic Society.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu