Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a versatile alternative to open pyeloplasty.

Autor:	Srivastava A; Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India. anees@sgpgi.ac.in, Singh P, Maheshwari R, Ansari MS, Dubey D, Kapoor R, Kumar A, Mandhani A
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Urologia internationalis [Urol Int] 2009; Vol. 83 (4), pp. 420-4. Date of Electronic Publication: 2009 Dec 08.
DOI:	10.1159/000251182
Abstrakt:	Objective: To report the safety, efficacy and versatility of laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LPP) in treatment of pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO). Patients and Methods: From January 2002 to November 2006, 185 patients (186 units; 182 with primary and 4 with secondary PUJO) underwent LPP (transperitoneal approach in 184; retroperitoneal approach in 2). A double J stent was placed antegradely in 121 (68.4%) units, cystoscopically in 50 units (28.2%), and 6 units (3.4%) were stentless. Patients were followed up clinically, with additional diuretic renogram. Results: Surgery was completed laparoscopically in 177 units, and conversion was required in 9 (4.8%) units. Pyeloplasty was dismembered in 143 units, Foley YV plasty in 26 units, and Fenger pyeloplasty in 8 units. The median estimated blood loss, operative time and hospital stay were 50 ml, 180 min and 4 days, respectively. Overall, 18 (9.6%) patients had complications. Improvements in drainage patterns of 167 out of 177 units (94.3%) were shown on a renal scan at a median follow-up of 39 months (range: 3-63 months). Conclusion: LPP is a safe, effective and versatile method for treatment of PUJO, which is applicable to all age groups, even in the presence of secondary stones, crossing vessels and secondary PUJO. (Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu