Inteligência geográfica na construção de políticas públicas: rumo à plataforma de monitoramento de áreas verdes urbanas do Estado de São Paulo

Autor: Marcel Fantin, Julio Cesar Pedrassoli, Breno Malheiros de Melo, Gustavo Paixão Menezes, Marcos Roberto Martines

Publikováno v: Interações (Campo Grande), Volume: 23, Issue: 3, Pages: 907-922, Published: 16 DEC 2022

Resumo: Este artigo apresenta o estado da arte de uma plataforma de monitoramento de áreas verdes urbanas – UrbVerde – para municípios do Estado de São Paulo. Sua construção se baseia em Cloud Computing e sensoriamento remoto orbital. Objeti

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0e473b0d1168db47b380f3dcb9d9090c
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1518-70122022000300907&lng=en&tlng=en

Sendero interpretativo para niños de Escuela Primaria: uso de situaciones lúdicas, sensoriales y culturales en Caçu, Goiás, Brasil

Autor: Morais, Isa Lucia de, Campos, Renata Martins, Costa, Núbia Aparecida Alves, Ferreira, Vitória Aparecida de Oliveira

Publikováno v: Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e50211125359
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e50211125359
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e50211125359
Research, Society and Development
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI

Environmental Education is an efficient instrument in the educational process, with a view to involving the school community and raising awareness in people's environmental education. In this perspective, the objective of this research was to impleme

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______3056::8651b2b48297789c964f89484afb3cac
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25359

Huella hídrica y huella de carbono en zonas verdes de Pamplona

Autor: Zabalza Ojer, Idoia

Publikováno v: Academica-e. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra
instname
Academica-e: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra
Universidad Pública de Navarra

Un 16,6% de la superficie de Pamplona está ocupada por zonas verdes, por lo que es necesario disponer de modelos de gestión sostenibles para su correcto mantenimiento. El objetivo de este trabajo fue conocer el consumo teórico de agua a partir de

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::77c73b3586b90b31be4c282722e96d24
https://hdl.handle.net/2454/39353

Governance, Nature’s Contributions to People, and Investing in Conservation Influence the Valuation of Urban Green Areas

Autor: Fernando Carriazo, Francisco J. Escobedo, Alexandra Pineda-Guerrero

Publikováno v: Land
Volume 10
Issue 1
Nowak, D.J.; Dwyer, J.F. Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 25–46.
Valente, D.; Pasimeni, M.R.; Petrosillo, I. The role of green infrastructures in Italian cities by linking natural and social capital. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 108, 105694. [
Haase, D.; Larondelle, N.; Andersson, E.; Artmann, M.; Borgström, S.; Breuste, J.; Gomez-Baggethun, E.; Gren, Å.; Hamstead, Z.; Hansen, R.; et al. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 2014, 43, 413–433
Escobedo, F.J.; Kroeger, T.; Wagner, J.E. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: Analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 2078–2087
Lyytimäki, J.; Petersen, L.K.; Normander, B.; Bezák, P. Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle. Environ. Sci. 2008, 5, 161–172.
Soto, J.R.; Escobedo, F.J.; Khachatryan, H.; Adams, D.C. Consumer demand for urban forest ecosystem services and disservices: Examining trade-offs using choice experiments and best-worst scaling. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 29, 31–39.
Andersson, E.; Barthel, S.; Ahrné, K. Measuring social–Ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17, 1267–1278.
Ernstson, H.; Barthel, S.; Andersson, E.; Borgström, S.T. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of stockholm. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, 28.
Kabisch, N. Ecosystem service implementation and governance challenges in urban green space planning—The case of Berlin, Germany. Land Use Policy 2015, 42, 557–567.
Lyytimäki, J.; Sipilä, M. Hopping on one leg–The challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For. Urban Green. 2009, 8, 309–315.
Andersson, E.; McPhearson, T.; Kremer, P.; Gomez-Baggethun, E.; Haase, D.; Tuvendal, M.; Wurster, D. Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 12, 157–164.
Haase, D.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Elmqvist, T. Ecosystem Services in Urban Landscapes: Practical Applications and Governance Implications. Ambio 2014, 43, 407–412.
Balooni, K.; Gangopadhyay, K.; Kumar, B.M. Governance for private green spaces in a growing Indian city. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 123, 21–29.
Daw, T.M.; Brown, K.; Rosendo, S.; Pomeroy, R. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: The need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ. Conserv. 2011, 38, 370–379.
Scopelliti, M.; Carrus, G.; Adinolfi, C.; Suárez-Cáceres, G.; Colangelo, G.; Lafortezza, R.; Panno, A.; Sanesi, G. Staying in touch with nature and well-being in different income groups: The experience of urban parks in Bogotá. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 148, 139–148.
Pascual, U.; Balvanera, P.; Díaz, S.; Pataki, G.; Roth, E.; Stenseke, M.; Watson, R.T.; Dessane, E.B.; Islar, M.; Kelemen, E.; et al. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2017, 26–27, 7–16.
Escobedo, F.J.; Giannico, V.; Jim, C.Y.; Sanesi, G.; Lafortezza, R. Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 37, 3–12.
Dıaz, S.; Pascual, U.M.; Stenseke, B.; Martın-López, R.T.; Watson, Z.; Molnár, R.; Hill, K.M.; Chan, I.A.; Baste, K.A.; Brauman, S.; et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people: Recognizing culture, and diverse sources of knowledge, can improve assessments. Science 2018, 359, 270–272.
Carriazo, F. Arborización y crimen urbano en Bogotá. IDEAS. 2017. Documentos CEDE 015286, Universidad de los Andes-CEDE. Available
Dobbs, C.; Escobedo, F.J.; Clerici, N.; De La Barrera, F.; Eleuterio, A.A.; MacGregor-Fors, I.; Reyes-Paecke, S.; Vásquez, A.; Camaño, J.D.Z.; Hernández, H.J. Urban ecosystem Services in Latin America: Mismatch between global concepts and regional realities? Urban Ecosyst. 2019, 22, 173–187.
Chaudhry, P.; Singh, B.; Tewari, V.P. Non-market economic valuation in developing countries: Role of participant observation method in CVM analysis. J. For. Econ. 2007, 13, 259–275.
Kenward, R.E.; Whittingham, M.J.; Arampatzis, S.; Manos, B.D.; Hahn, T.; Terry, A.; Simoncini, R.; Alcorn, J.; Bastian, O.; Donlan, M.; et al. Identifying governance strategies that effectively support ecosystem services, resource sustainability, and biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5308–5312.
Kreye, M.M.; Adams, D.C.; Escobedo, F.J.; Soto, J.R. Does policy process influence public values for forest-water resource protection in Florida? Ecol. Econ. 2016, 129, 122–131.
Huang, C.-W.; McDonald, R.I.; Seto, K.C. The importance of land governance for biodiversity conservation in an era of global urban expansion. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 173, 44–50.
Perkins, H.A. Out from the (Green) shadow? Neoliberal hegemony through the market logic of shared urban environmental governance. Politi Geogr. 2009, 28, 395–405.
Turnhout, E.; Neves, K.; De Lijster, E. ‘Measurementality’ in Biodiversity Governance: Knowledge, Transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Ipbes). Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 2014, 46, 581–597.
Bell, S.; Hindmoor, A. Governance without government? The case of the forest stewardship council. Public Adm. 2011, 90, 144–159.
Lawrence, A.; De Vreese, R.; Johnston, M.; Bosch, C.C.K.V.D.; Sanesi, G. Urban forest governance: Towards a framework for comparing approaches. Urban For. Urban Green. 2013, 12, 464–473.
Connolly, J.J.; Svendsen, E.S.; Fisher, D.R.; Campbell, L.K. Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 109, 76–84.
Van Den Bosch, C.C.K.; Rodbell, P.; Salbitano, F.; Sayers, K.; Villarpando, S.J.; Yokohari, M. The changing governance of urban forests. Unasylva 2018, 69, 37–42.
Launay-Gama, C.; Pachón, M. Prácticas de evaluación de la gobernanza en América Latina; Universidad de Los Andes: Bogotá, Colombia, 2011
Atmi¸s, E.; Batuhan Gün¸sen, H.; Yüceda ˘g, C.; Lise, W. Factors affecting the use of urban forests in Turkey. Turk. J. For. 2017, 18, 1–10.
Shackleton, R.T.; Angelstam, P.; Van Der Waal, B.; Elbakidze, M. Progress made in managing and valuing ecosystem services: A horizon scan of gaps in research, management and governance. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 27, 232–241.
Lockwood, M. Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91, 754–766.
Barrett, C.; Gibson, C.; Hoffman, B.; Mccubbins, M. The complex links between governance and biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20, 1358–1366.
Falk, T.; Spangenberg, J.H.; Siegmund-Schultze, M.; Kobbe, S.; Feike, T.; Kuebler, D.; Settele, J.; Vorlaufer, T. Identifying governance challenges in ecosystem services management—Conceptual considerations and comparison of global forest cases. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 32, 193–203
Piña, W.H.A.; Martínez, C.I.P. Urban material flow analysis: An approach for Bogotá, Colombia. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 42, 32–42.
Escobedo, F.J.; Clerici, N.; Staudhammer, C.L.; Corzo, G.T. Socio-ecological dynamics and inequality in Bogotá, Colombia’s public urban forests and their ecosystem services. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 1040–1053.
Meza, C.A. Crossroads and Conflict. Urbanization, Conservation and Rurality in the Eastern Mountains of Bogotá. Rev. Colomb. Antropol. 2008, 44, 439–480.
Escobedo, F.J.; Clerici, N.; Staudhammer, C.L.; Feged-Rivadeneira, A.; Bohorquez, J.C.; Tovar, G. Trees and Crime in Bogota, Colombia: Is the link an ecosystem disservice or service? Land Use Policy 2018, 78, 583–592.
Wurster, D.; Artmann, M. Development of a Concept for Non-monetary Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Services at the Site Level. Ambio 2014, 43, 454–465.
Martín-López, B.; Iniesta-Arandia, I.; García-Llorente, M.; Palomo, I.; Casado-Arzuaga, I.; Del Amo, D.G.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Oteros-Rozas, E.; Palacios-Agundez, I.; Willaarts, B.; et al. Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38970.
Dobbs, C.; Hernández-Moreno, Á.; Reyes-Paecke, S.; Miranda, M.D. Exploring temporal dynamics of urban ecosystem services in Latin America: The case of Bogota (Colombia) and Santiago (Chile). Ecol. Indic. 2018, 85, 1068–1080.
Agbenyega, O.; Burgess, P.J.; Cook, M.; Morris, J. Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, 551–557
Ricaurte, L.F.; Olaya-Rodríguez, M.H.; Cepeda-Valencia, J.; Lara, D.; Arroyave-Suárez, J.; Finlayson, C.M.; Palomo, I. Future impacts of drivers of change on wetland ecosystem services in Colombia. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2017, 44, 158–169.
Hartter, J.; Goldman, A. Local responses to a forest park in western Uganda: Alternate narratives on fortress conservation. Oryx 2010, 45, 60–68.
Allendorf, T.D.; Yang, J. The role of ecosystem services in park–people relationships: The case of Gaoligongshan Nature Reserve in southwest China. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 167, 187–193.
García-Suaza, A.F.; Guataquí, J.C.; Guerra, J.A.; Maldonado, D. Beyond the Mincer equation: The internal rate of return to higher education in Colombia. Educ Econ. 2014, 22, 328–344.
Kadykalo, A.N.; López-Rodriguez, M.D.; Ainscough, J.; Droste, N.; Ryu, H.; Ávila-Flores, G.; Le Clec’H, S.; Muñoz, M.C.; Nilsson, L.; Rana, S.; et al. Disentangling ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘nature’s contributions to people’. Ecosyst. People 2019, 15, 269–287.
Acey, C. Managing wickedness in the Niger Delta: Can a new approach to multi-stakeholder governance increase voice and sustainability? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 154, 102–114
Sarkki, S. Governance services: Co-producing human well-being with ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 27, 82–91.
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
Land, Vol 10, Iss 14, p 14 (2021)

There is little information concerning how people in the Global South perceive the benefits and costs associated with urban green areas. There is even less information on how governance influences the way people value these highly complex socio-ecolo

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::db265aeb9ca3d05fba2f29a0337b0e5e

Regeneración urbana en el Barrio de los Faroles y realojo en obra nueva (Alaquàs)

Autor: Gil Hoyos, Jorge

Publikováno v: RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
instname

[ES] El objeto del presente trabajo parte el análisis de las zonas urbanas que reclaman de intervención dentro de los municipios de Aldaia y Alaquàs. Desde esta perspectiva se localizan algunas zonas con patrones similares en las que, por motivos

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::18b3f9ceca77ae47eabf91b6c54dee21
http://hdl.handle.net/10251/165744