Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 36
pro vyhledávání: '"critical appraisal tools"'
Autor:
Lovasi, Gina S., author, Henson, Rosie Mae, author
Publikováno v:
Urban Public Health : A Research Toolkit for Practice and Impact, 2020, ill.
Externí odkaz:
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190885304.003.0010
Publikováno v:
فصلنامه پرستاری،مامایی و پیراپزشکی, Vol 3, Iss 3, Pp 57-72 (2018)
Background & Aim: Selection of an appropriate critical appraisal tool is an important part of evidence-based practice. The aim of the present study was to do a systematic review of articles according to existing evidence in databases in the field of
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/0694f7787db2428c9ae6e2010db0470a
Publikováno v:
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol 45, Iss 3, Pp 210-211 (2021)
Abstract Objective: To highlight the emerging ethos of cultural rigour in the use of critical appraisal tools in research involving First Nations peoples. Methods: Critical reflection on recent systematic review experience. Results: The concept of cu
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/f079974d571b4021b94a0f9f998a9f8e
Publikováno v:
In Nursing Research Edition: Tenth Edition. 2022:47-70
Akademický článek
Tento výsledek nelze pro nepřihlášené uživatele zobrazit.
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
Autor:
Kristine Rasmussen, Lesley A. Stewart, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Lasse Østengaard, Andreas Lundh, Isabelle Boutron
Publikováno v:
Lundh, A, Rasmussen, K, Østengaard, L, Boutron, I, Stewart, L A & Hrõbjartsson, A 2020, ' Systematic review finds that appraisal tools for medical research studies address conflicts of interest superficially ', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 120, pp. 104-115 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.005
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Elsevier, 2020, 120, pp.104-115. ⟨10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.005⟩
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Elsevier, 2020, 120, pp.104-115. ⟨10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.005⟩
ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to identify and summarize 1) appraisal tools and other guides which address conflicts of interest in medical research studies; and 2) top journals with policies on managing conflicts of interest in journal pa
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3b6d127e100f225f064f4531a0c0fb0d
https://findresearcher.sdu.dk:8443/ws/files/161012701/Systematic_review_finds_that_appraisal_tools_for_medical_research_studies_address_conflicts_of_interest_superficially.pdf
https://findresearcher.sdu.dk:8443/ws/files/161012701/Systematic_review_finds_that_appraisal_tools_for_medical_research_studies_address_conflicts_of_interest_superficially.pdf
Publikováno v:
فصلنامه پرستاری،مامایی و پیراپزشکی, Vol 3, Iss 3, Pp 57-72 (2018)
Background & Aim: Selection of an appropriate critical appraisal tool is an important part of evidence-based practice. The aim of the present study was to do a systematic review of articles according to existing evidence in databases in the field of
Autor:
Thomas Harder
Publikováno v:
International Journal of Health Policy and Management, Vol 3, Iss 5, Pp 289-290 (2014)
Decisions in healthcare should be based on information obtained according to the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). An increasing number of systematic reviews are published which summarize the results of prevalence studies. Interpretation o
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/3fa52f5dcd4f46f290e652fd3b868e2f
Publikováno v:
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol 45, Iss 3, Pp 210-211 (2021)
Objective: To highlight the emerging ethos of cultural rigour in the use of critical appraisal tools in research involving First Nations peoples. Methods: Critical reflection on recent systematic review experience. Results: The concept of cultural ri
Autor:
Nauman Bin Ali, Muhammad Usman
Context: Methodological research on systematic literature reviews (SLRs)in Software Engineering (SE)has so far focused on developing and evaluating guidelines for conducting systematic reviews. However, the support for quality assessment of completed
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::e81a177fe408ae74d4f8ebfeae00a09e
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-17898
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-17898