Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 49
pro vyhledávání: '"Zachary Hoskins"'
Autor:
Larry May, Zachary Hoskins
This anthology brings together legal and philosophical theorists to examine the normative and conceptual foundations of international criminal law. In particular, through these essays the international group of authors addresses questions of state so
Autor:
Zachary Hoskins
Publikováno v:
American Philosophical Quarterly. 60:117-130
A criminal conviction can trigger numerous burdensome legal consequences beyond the formal sentence. Some charge that these “collateral” legal consequences (CLCs) constitute additional measures of punishment, which raises the further question of
Publikováno v:
Journal of Popular Music Studies. 34:5-27
Autor:
Zachary Hoskins
Publikováno v:
Sentencing the Self-Convicted ISBN: 9781509957439
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::47e99627bb86744ce1d4bb0ba086a218
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509957460.ch-004
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509957460.ch-004
Autor:
Zachary Hoskins
Publikováno v:
Journal of Applied Philosophy.
Autor:
Zachary Hoskins
Chad Flanders has argued that retributivism is inconsistent with John Rawls’s core notion of public reason, which sets out those considerations on which legitimate exercises of state power can be based. Flanders asserts that retributivism is ground
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d652fe5fb2f79703d23ccd655fe49c69
Autor:
Zachary Hoskins
Publikováno v:
The Modern Law Review. 83:487-491
Autor:
Zachary Hoskins
Publikováno v:
Criminal Law and Philosophy. 14:135-140
Mark Dsouza’s new book, Rationale-Based Defences in Criminal Law, aims to shed new light on the question of how to conceptualize justifications and excuses as defenses against criminal liability. His offers an alternative to the common account on w
Autor:
Zachary Hoskins
Publikováno v:
The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Science of Punishment ISBN: 9780429507212
This chapter examines the hybrid strategy of disaggregating the question of punishment’s rationale from the question of how it should be constrained, and of answering these questions by appeal to different moral considerations. The chapter argues t
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9794307aadcca060680222da7198d4c5
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507212-6
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507212-6