Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 278
pro vyhledávání: '"Wouters, Paul"'
Publikováno v:
Scientometrics, 2020
Sufficient data presence is one of the key preconditions for applying metrics in practice. Based on both Altmetric.com data and Mendeley data collected up to 2019, this paper presents a state-of-the-art analysis of the presence of 12 kinds of altmetr
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12630
This is the first European guide to science, technology, and innovation (STI) studies. It aims to facilitate public access to these relatively young specialties of academic and strategic research. STI studies study the development of scientific knowl
Externí odkaz:
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105625
This chapter approaches, both from a theoretical and practical perspective, the most important principles and conceptual frameworks that can be considered in the application of social media metrics for scientific evaluation. We propose conceptually v
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.10541
Autor:
Franssen, Thomas, Wouters, Paul
Bibliometrics offers a particular representation of science. Through bibliometric methods a bibliometrician will always highlight particular elements of publications, and through these elements operationalize particular representations of science, wh
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.04004
This study presents a large scale analysis of the distribution and presence of Mendeley readership scores over time and across disciplines. We study whether Mendeley readership scores (RS) can identify highly cited publications more effectively than
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.07104
Bibliometric indicators such as journal impact factors, h-indices, and total citation counts are algorithmic artifacts that can be used in research evaluation and management. These artifacts have no meaning by themselves, but receive their meaning fr
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04793
In a critical and provocative paper, Abramo and D'Angelo claim that commonly used scientometric indicators such as the mean normalized citation score (MNCS) are completely inappropriate as indicators of scientific performance. Abramo and D'Angelo arg
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.02378
Autor:
Mas Sánchez, Avelino *, Chavan, Rene, Dall'Acqua, Davide, Gagliardi, Mario, Goodman, Timothy, Pacheco Cansino, Jose, Ordoñez, Eduardo Rodriguez, Saibene, Gabriella, Wouters, Paul
Publikováno v:
In Fusion Engineering and Design April 2021 165
In this study, the academic status of users of scientific publications in Mendeley is explored in order to analyse the usage pattern of Mendeley users in terms of subject fields, citation and readership impact. The main focus of this study is on stud
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02093
In this paper an analysis of the presence and possibilities of altmetrics for bibliometric and performance analysis is carried out. Using the web based tool Impact Story, we have collected metrics for 20,000 random publications from the Web of Scienc
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02095