Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 49
pro vyhledávání: '"William D. Blake"'
Why are some constitutions amended more frequently than others? Despite the importance of this question to political science and legal theory, there is little consensus regarding the forces that shape constitutional amendments. Some scholars only foc
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::031acfc2b4009a71078d371693240a8a
https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2021-kcnvt
https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2021-kcnvt
Publikováno v:
Politics and Religion. 13:57-88
As more debates in American politics become constitutional questions, effective citizens must engage in constitutional interpretation. While most Americans venerate the Constitution as a part of a national, civil religion, levels of constitutional kn
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::206528406d429caadb28c609666d2d3f
https://doi.org/10.1017/s175504831900021x
https://doi.org/10.1017/s175504831900021x
Autor:
William D. Blake
Publikováno v:
The Forum. 17:315-343
This paper explores the racial origins and legacy of the Electoral College through historical and quantitative analyses. At the Constitutional Convention, the Electoral College served the interests of Southern slaveowners by perpetuating the advantag
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f17c15ffb7cf8baef7b7b9b453f74687
https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2019-0019
https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2019-0019
Autor:
William D. Blake
Publikováno v:
Presidential Studies Quarterly. 49:204-218
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::e119b1b8e7d682dfe5518444ec32a1a6
https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12513
https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12513
Autor:
William D. Blake, Carolyn Forestiere
Publikováno v:
Teaching Research Methods in Political Science ISBN: 9781839101212
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::bed17925b729be300dc4a3c3a43de09b
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839101212.00023
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839101212.00023
Autor:
William D. Blake
Political scientists and constitutional theorists agree that the New Deal represents a significant change to American life, but they disagree as to why. I provide a first attempt at evaluating the relative persuasiveness of the traditional realignmen
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::705d9150ac11352343c3b383659b8284
https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2020-3w1sh
https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2020-3w1sh
Autor:
William D. Blake, Ian G. Anson
Scholars of comparative constitution-making and direct democracy agree that economic conditions affect public support for constitutional reform but disagree as to how. Prospect theory suggests both approaches may be correct, depending on the politica
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::59b90687859c469a6facef3f61a467d3
Autor:
William D. Blake
Publikováno v:
Justice System Journal. 39:21-38
The state supreme court literature often overlooks the twelve states that use traditional appointment systems or fails to explore differences in their judicial designs. Eight states require justice...
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::94785f18fb593c48af3c27b82e033ae0
https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2017.1385431
https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2017.1385431
Publikováno v:
Law & Society Review. 49:973-997
We investigate why the Supreme Court grants a smaller percentage of cases at the first conference of each term compared to other conferences. According to received wisdom, Supreme Court law clerks are overly cautious at the beginning of their tenure
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1729d23aac08fca6bbffda679ab0f437
https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12165
https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12165
Autor:
William D. Blake
Publikováno v:
PS: Political Science & Politics. 45:271-276
During his confirmation hearings, then-judge John Roberts analogized the role of a judge to the role of a baseball umpire. Roberts argued that umpires do not make the rules; they simply apply them. Legal scholars have criticized Roberts from a legal
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::bbaa631df8c4d7d6e3c2f628102fdf09
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096511002101
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096511002101