Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 26
pro vyhledávání: '"William Baude"'
Autor:
William Baude, Stephen E Sachs
Publikováno v:
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 43:178-201
A legal system’s ‘official story’ is its shared account of the law’s structure and sources, which members of its legal community publicly advance and defend. In some societies, however, officials pay lip service to this shared account, while
Autor:
William Baude
Publikováno v:
The Supreme Court Review. 2019:313-334
Supreme Court precedent is a topic of perennial prominence. The Court overruled or severely limited multiple precedents last year, just as it did the year before that. Because of our widely-repeated norm of stare decisis, every overruling is criticiz
Autor:
William Baude
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Autor:
William Baude, Stephen E. Sachs
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Autor:
Stephen E. Sachs, William Baude
Publikováno v:
Law and History Review. 37:809-820
Originalism has long been criticized for its “law office history” and other historical sins. But a recent “positive turn” in originalist thought may help make peace between history and law. On this theory, originalism is best understood as a
An annual peer-reviewed law journal covering the legal implications of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States. Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative su
An annual peer-reviewed law journal covering the legal implications of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States. Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey o
Autor:
William Baude
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
The latest volume in the Supreme Court Review series. Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR
Autor:
William Baude
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
In an important article, Scott Keller argues that in 1871 “the common law definitively accorded at least qualified immunity to all executive officers’ discretionary duties.” This is not correct. The common law did not recognize the doctrine of