Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 122
pro vyhledávání: '"W. Krabbe"'
Autor:
Jan Albert van Laar, Erik C. W. Krabbe
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 39, Iss 3 (2019)
When can exerting pressure in a public controversy promote reasonable outcomes, and when is it rather a hindrance? We show how negotiation and persuasion dialogue can be intertwined. Then, we examine in what ways one can in a public controversy exert
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/a4710be6e0b24501bfce238784b73402
Autor:
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Jan Albert van Laar
Publikováno v:
Journal of Argumentation in Context, 10(2), 226-244. John Benjamins Publishers
Are we living in an age of unreason? And what to do about it? Can we combat unreason? We discuss situations in which one may presume to be confronted with unreasonable behavior by an interlocutor: fallacies, changing rules of the game, shifting to so
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a9135963425879270e40a73ddce5ff70
https://hdl.handle.net/11370/f0f0aa15-ff0e-497b-9af6-e6ed6661ddb9
https://hdl.handle.net/11370/f0f0aa15-ff0e-497b-9af6-e6ed6661ddb9
Autor:
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Bart Verheij
Publikováno v:
Argumentation. 35:513-518
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::07082d709ca8a98a065e0e5c12a8dd31
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09531-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09531-1
Autor:
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Jan Albert van Laar
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 27, Iss 1, Pp 27-58 (2008)
We shall investigate the similarities and dissimilarities between old and new dialectic. For the ‘old dialectic’, we base our survey mainly on Aristotle’s Topics and Sophistical Refutations, whereas for the ‘new dialectic’, we turn to conte
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/4710e4171e34455bbb0b5edf726bdeec
Publikováno v:
Cahiers Sens public. :1-28
Criticism may degenerate into quibbling or nitpicking. How can discussants keep quibblers under control? In the paper we investigate cases in which a battle about words replaces a ldiscussion of the matters that are actually at issue as well as cases
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::aff53158d76350508fc7afdffc9f71a8
https://doi.org/10.3917/csp.023.0001
https://doi.org/10.3917/csp.023.0001
Autor:
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Jan Albert van Laar
Publikováno v:
University of Groningen
Informal Logic, Vol 39, Iss 3 (2019)
Informal Logic, Vol 39, Iss 3 (2019)
When can exerting pressure in a public controversy promote reasonable outcomes, and when is it rather a hindrance? We show how negotiation and persuasion dialogue can be intertwined. Then, we examine in what ways one can in a public controversy exert
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::949d66adb29f115c7e62fe24d46fb117
https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v39i3.5739
https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v39i3.5739
Publikováno v:
ChemCatChem. 11:5748-5753
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::de9b43f2161b4137d099930729a041a0
https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201900393
https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201900393
Autor:
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Jan Albert van Laar
Publikováno v:
Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(1), 91-111. John Benjamins Publishers
The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approv
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::901cd50ab1e32e019916e438e9a0f58f
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18009.laa
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18009.laa
Autor:
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Jan Albert van Laar
Publikováno v:
Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing, 41(1), 159-171
Pressure and argumentation in public controversiesDiscussants in a public controversy are also players in a social arena. Underwhat circumstances can means of exerting pressure promote reasonableoutcomes, and when are they rather hindrances to their
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3dc349459d3f8234966c4044419d6cf5
https://hdl.handle.net/11370/22116530-2070-4d60-8487-f6c9320d3bfa
https://hdl.handle.net/11370/22116530-2070-4d60-8487-f6c9320d3bfa
Autor:
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Jan Albert van Laar
Publikováno v:
Synthese, 198(4), 3459-3476. SPRINGER
Criticism may degenerate into quibbling or nitpicking. How can discussants keep quibblers under control? In the paper we investigate cases in which a battle about words replaces a discussion of the matters that are actually at issue as well as cases
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::4771ff7d0383936b1d99eaf1357b5396
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/369430c6-be44-46fc-a58c-c935921c149f
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/369430c6-be44-46fc-a58c-c935921c149f
