Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 83
pro vyhledávání: '"Virginia Aldigé Hiday"'
Autor:
Virginia Aldigé Hiday
Publikováno v:
Involuntary Detention and Therapeutic Jurisprudence
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::e3d8a84b0520e4f723904700c63954f3
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315251844-18
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315251844-18
Autor:
Virginia Aldigé Hiday, Kelli E. Canada
Publikováno v:
The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. 25:321-340
Mental health courts (MHCs) operate on the principles of procedural justice (PJ). PJ highlights the importance of process over outcomes in encounters with authority. Subjective perceptions of having voice, being heard by decision-makers, and being tr
Publikováno v:
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 20:191-199
Mental health courts (MHCs), nontraditional problem-solving courts designed to address underlying causes of offending rather than apportion guilt and punishment, have been reported to reduce offending among persons with mental illness and consequentl
Publikováno v:
American Behavioral Scientist. 57:189-208
There are now more than 300 mental health courts in the United States; yet studies on their effectiveness in reducing criminal recidivism are relatively few, and most follow defendants after entry into the court, during their participation, and somet
Publikováno v:
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 33:265-271
Based on qualitative observation and quantitative data from eight mental health courts (MHCs), this article argues that observed reductions in recidivism from participation in MHC are caused in part by the role of the judge in conveying elements of p
Autor:
Bradley Ray, Virginia Aldigé Hiday
Publikováno v:
Psychiatric Services. 61:463-468
Objective: Relatively few studies have evaluated whether mental health courts reduce criminal recidivism. This study evaluated an established court and followed for two years defendants who exited the program in the court’s fifth year of operation.
Publikováno v:
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 29:451-468
The lively debate over mandated community treatment in general and outpatient commitment laws (OPC) in particular has raised many issues. At its core, the debate is over how and to what extent laws should be formulated to persuade, leverage or coerce
Publikováno v:
Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 16:575-580
Purpose of reviewThe aim of this article is to evaluate the social control exerted on persons with severe mental illness by civil commitment and arrest under conditions of increasing limits on mental hospitalization and on resources for community tre
Autor:
Virginia Aldigé Hiday
Publikováno v:
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 9:8-32
This article briefly describes the historical conditions in the origin and development of outpatient commitment that framed the discourse on its merits and the empirical studies on its outcomes. It divides those empirical studies into two sets on the