Zobrazeno 1 - 5
of 5
pro vyhledávání: '"Villán Gaona, Jorge Luciano"'
Autor:
Villán-Gaona, Jorge Luciano, Valderrama-Molina, Carlos Oliver, Altamirano-Cruz, Marco Antonio, Montero-Oropeza, Yuri
Publikováno v:
In Injury November 2023 54 Supplement 6
Autor:
Villán Gaona, Jorge Luciano
Publikováno v:
Ouanes J-P, García T, Sieber F. Special Anesthetic Consideration for the Fragility Fracture Patient. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 2014;30(2):243–59.
Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis International. 2006;17:1726–33.
Nikitovic M, Wodchis WP, Krahn MD, Cadarette SM. Direct health-care costs attributed to hip fractures among seniors: A matched cohort study. Osteoporosis International. 2013;24(2):659–69.
Beratarrechea A, Diehl M, Saimovici J, Pace N, Trossero A, Plantalech L. Mortalidad a largo plazo y factores predictores en pacientes con fractura de cadera. Actualizaciones en Osteologia. 2011;7(1):9–18.
Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, Guyatt GH, Schemitsch E, Debeer J, et al. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association. 2010;182(15):1609–16.
Robertson GA, Wood AM. Hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fracture: What is the current evidence? World journal of orthopedics. 2018;9(11):235–44.
Palm H, Krasheninnikoff M, Holck K, Lemser T, Foss NB, Jacobsen S, et al. A new algorithm for hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthopaedica. 2012;83(1):26–30.
Beltrán A. Características de las fracturas de fémur proximal. Repertorio de medicina y cirugia. 2017;6(4):213–8.
Melton LJ, Clinic M, Infirmary R. Hip Fractures in the Elderly : A World-Wide Projection. Osteoporosis International. 1992;285–9.
Chen YT, Peng LN, Liu CL, Chen LK. Orthogeriatrics in Taiwan: Overview and experiences. Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2011;2(3):66–70.
Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, McCann RM. Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: Total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008;56(7):1349–56.
14. Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, McCann RM. Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: Total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008;56(7):1349–56.
15. Connolly KP, Kamath AF. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: Comparative outcomes and contemporary results. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2016;7(2):94.
16. Laude F. Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior Hueter minimally invasive approach. Interactive Surgery. 2006;1(1–4):5–11.
17. Hernández-vaquero D. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología Influence of preoperative variables on total hip arthroplasty results. Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología (English edition). 2011;55(2):91–7.
18. Flecher X, Ollivier M, Argenson JN. Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research. 2016;102(1):S9–20.
19. Vanrusselt J, Vansevenant M, Vanderschueren G, Vanhoenacker F. Postoperative radiograph of the hip arthroplasty: what the radiologist should know. Insights into Imaging. 2015;6(6):591–600.
20. Restrepo-betancur LF. Análisis comparativo de la esperanza de vida en Sudamérica, 1980 – 2010. 2014;177–87.
21. Ilchmann T. Approaches for primary total hip replacement. HIP International. 2014;24(July):S2–6.
22. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthopaedica. 2012;83(5):442–8.
23. Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Clark CR. A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013;28(5):849–54.
24. Veltman ES, Wolkenfelt J, Poolman RW. PICO : Anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. 2017;(June).
25. Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE, Lin TJ. Anterior vs. Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2015;30(3):419–34.
28. Of A, Management C. Cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. 2014;80:336–47.
29. Hambright D, Hellman M, Barrack R. Intra-operative digital imaging: Assuring the alignment of components when undertaking total hip arthroplasty. Bone and Joint Journal. 2018;100B(1):36–43.
30. Parvizi. Sharkey. Surgical Treatment of Limb-Length Discrepancy Following Total Hip Arthroplasty. 2004;(January 2016).
31. Mulcahy H, Chew FS. Current concepts of hip arthroplasty for radiologists: Part 2, revisions and complications. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012;199(3):570–80.
32. Scheerlinck T. Cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica. 2014;80(3):336–47.
33. Poster S, Balanika A, Theocharakis S, Vrizidou S, Drosos C, Baltas C. Radiographic interpretation of hip replacement hardware . A pictorial essay . 2014;1–23.
34. Chan J, Khoriati AA, Chiang CH, Hadithy N Al. Understanding, Interpreting and Reporting a Total Hip Arthroplasty Radiograph. Orthopedic & Muscular System. 2017;06(03).
35. Clement ND, S. Patrick-Patel R, MacDonald D, Breusch SJ. Total hip replacement: increasing femoral offset improves functional outcome. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2016;136(9):1317–23.
36. Blum A, Meyer JB, Raymond A, Louis M, Bakour O, Kechidi R, et al. Developments in imaging methods used in hip arthroplasty: a diagnostic algorithm. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 2016;97(7–8):725–33.
37. Awan O, Chen L, Resnik CS. Imaging evaluation of complications of hip arthroplasty: Review of current concepts and imaging findings. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 2013;64(4):306–13.
38. Marsland D, Mears SC. A Review of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Associated With Total Hip Arthroplasty. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation. 2012;3(3):107–20.
39. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-Series B. 1993;75(5):797–8.
40. Kristensen MT, Foss NB, Ekdahl C, Kehlet H. Prefracture functional level evaluated by the New Mobility Score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthopaedica. 2010;81(3):296–302.
41. Hernández I, Martínez M, Belén A, López S, Reolid R, Gema M, et al. Análisis de la comorbilidad y calidad de vida de pacientes mayores polimedicados. Revista Clínica de Medicina de Familia. 2016;9(2):91–9.
42. Rosas-Carrasco O, González-Flores E, Brito-Carrera AM, Vázquez-Valdez OE, Peschard-Sáenz E, Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, et al. Evaluación de la comorbilidad en el adulto mayor. Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. 2011;49(2):153–62.
43. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthopaedica. 2012 Oct;83(5):442–8.
44. Kristensen MT, Foss NB, Ekdahl C, Kehlet H. Prefracture functional level evaluated by the New Mobility Score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthopaedica. 2010 Jun 3;81(3):296–302.
45. Evanovich J, King L. Predictors for blood loss and transfusion frequency to guide blood saving programs in primary knee- and hip-arthroplasty.
46. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A NEW MOBILITY SCORE FOR PREDICTING MORTALITY AFTER HIP FRACTURE. Vol. 755. 1993.
47. Beratarrechea A, Diehl M, Saimovici J, Pace N, Tros A, Plantalech L. ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES / Originals MORTALIDAD A LARGO PLAZO Y FACTORES PREDICTORES EN PACIENTES CON FRACTURA DE CADERA. Vol. 7, Actual. Osteol. 2011.
48. Huerfano E, Bautista M, Huerfano M, Nossa JM. Use of Surgical Approach Is Not Associated With Instability After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis Comparing Direct Anterior and Posterolateral Approaches. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2021 Nov 15;29(22):e1126–40.
49. Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Clark CR. A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013 May;28(5):849–54.
50. Finch DJ, Martin BI, Patricia Franklin MD, Magder LS, Pellegrini VD. Patient-reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Comparison Based on Surgical Approaches Patient-reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 1 Multicenter Comparison Based on Surgical Approaches 2. The Journal of Arthroplasty.
51. Bosker BH, Verheyen CCPM, Horstmann WG, Tulp NJA. Poor accuracy of freehand cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2007 Jul;127(5):375–9.
52. Hambright D, Hellman M, Barrack R, Knight J. Intra-operative digital imaging ASSURING THE ALIGNMENT OF COMPONENTS WHEN UNDERTAKING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis International. 2006;17:1726–33.
Nikitovic M, Wodchis WP, Krahn MD, Cadarette SM. Direct health-care costs attributed to hip fractures among seniors: A matched cohort study. Osteoporosis International. 2013;24(2):659–69.
Beratarrechea A, Diehl M, Saimovici J, Pace N, Trossero A, Plantalech L. Mortalidad a largo plazo y factores predictores en pacientes con fractura de cadera. Actualizaciones en Osteologia. 2011;7(1):9–18.
Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, Guyatt GH, Schemitsch E, Debeer J, et al. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association. 2010;182(15):1609–16.
Robertson GA, Wood AM. Hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fracture: What is the current evidence? World journal of orthopedics. 2018;9(11):235–44.
Palm H, Krasheninnikoff M, Holck K, Lemser T, Foss NB, Jacobsen S, et al. A new algorithm for hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthopaedica. 2012;83(1):26–30.
Beltrán A. Características de las fracturas de fémur proximal. Repertorio de medicina y cirugia. 2017;6(4):213–8.
Melton LJ, Clinic M, Infirmary R. Hip Fractures in the Elderly : A World-Wide Projection. Osteoporosis International. 1992;285–9.
Chen YT, Peng LN, Liu CL, Chen LK. Orthogeriatrics in Taiwan: Overview and experiences. Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2011;2(3):66–70.
Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, McCann RM. Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: Total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008;56(7):1349–56.
14. Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, McCann RM. Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: Total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008;56(7):1349–56.
15. Connolly KP, Kamath AF. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: Comparative outcomes and contemporary results. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2016;7(2):94.
16. Laude F. Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior Hueter minimally invasive approach. Interactive Surgery. 2006;1(1–4):5–11.
17. Hernández-vaquero D. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología Influence of preoperative variables on total hip arthroplasty results. Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología (English edition). 2011;55(2):91–7.
18. Flecher X, Ollivier M, Argenson JN. Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research. 2016;102(1):S9–20.
19. Vanrusselt J, Vansevenant M, Vanderschueren G, Vanhoenacker F. Postoperative radiograph of the hip arthroplasty: what the radiologist should know. Insights into Imaging. 2015;6(6):591–600.
20. Restrepo-betancur LF. Análisis comparativo de la esperanza de vida en Sudamérica, 1980 – 2010. 2014;177–87.
21. Ilchmann T. Approaches for primary total hip replacement. HIP International. 2014;24(July):S2–6.
22. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthopaedica. 2012;83(5):442–8.
23. Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Clark CR. A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013;28(5):849–54.
24. Veltman ES, Wolkenfelt J, Poolman RW. PICO : Anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. 2017;(June).
25. Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE, Lin TJ. Anterior vs. Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2015;30(3):419–34.
28. Of A, Management C. Cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. 2014;80:336–47.
29. Hambright D, Hellman M, Barrack R. Intra-operative digital imaging: Assuring the alignment of components when undertaking total hip arthroplasty. Bone and Joint Journal. 2018;100B(1):36–43.
30. Parvizi. Sharkey. Surgical Treatment of Limb-Length Discrepancy Following Total Hip Arthroplasty. 2004;(January 2016).
31. Mulcahy H, Chew FS. Current concepts of hip arthroplasty for radiologists: Part 2, revisions and complications. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012;199(3):570–80.
32. Scheerlinck T. Cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica. 2014;80(3):336–47.
33. Poster S, Balanika A, Theocharakis S, Vrizidou S, Drosos C, Baltas C. Radiographic interpretation of hip replacement hardware . A pictorial essay . 2014;1–23.
34. Chan J, Khoriati AA, Chiang CH, Hadithy N Al. Understanding, Interpreting and Reporting a Total Hip Arthroplasty Radiograph. Orthopedic & Muscular System. 2017;06(03).
35. Clement ND, S. Patrick-Patel R, MacDonald D, Breusch SJ. Total hip replacement: increasing femoral offset improves functional outcome. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2016;136(9):1317–23.
36. Blum A, Meyer JB, Raymond A, Louis M, Bakour O, Kechidi R, et al. Developments in imaging methods used in hip arthroplasty: a diagnostic algorithm. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 2016;97(7–8):725–33.
37. Awan O, Chen L, Resnik CS. Imaging evaluation of complications of hip arthroplasty: Review of current concepts and imaging findings. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 2013;64(4):306–13.
38. Marsland D, Mears SC. A Review of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Associated With Total Hip Arthroplasty. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation. 2012;3(3):107–20.
39. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-Series B. 1993;75(5):797–8.
40. Kristensen MT, Foss NB, Ekdahl C, Kehlet H. Prefracture functional level evaluated by the New Mobility Score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthopaedica. 2010;81(3):296–302.
41. Hernández I, Martínez M, Belén A, López S, Reolid R, Gema M, et al. Análisis de la comorbilidad y calidad de vida de pacientes mayores polimedicados. Revista Clínica de Medicina de Familia. 2016;9(2):91–9.
42. Rosas-Carrasco O, González-Flores E, Brito-Carrera AM, Vázquez-Valdez OE, Peschard-Sáenz E, Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, et al. Evaluación de la comorbilidad en el adulto mayor. Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. 2011;49(2):153–62.
43. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthopaedica. 2012 Oct;83(5):442–8.
44. Kristensen MT, Foss NB, Ekdahl C, Kehlet H. Prefracture functional level evaluated by the New Mobility Score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthopaedica. 2010 Jun 3;81(3):296–302.
45. Evanovich J, King L. Predictors for blood loss and transfusion frequency to guide blood saving programs in primary knee- and hip-arthroplasty.
46. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A NEW MOBILITY SCORE FOR PREDICTING MORTALITY AFTER HIP FRACTURE. Vol. 755. 1993.
47. Beratarrechea A, Diehl M, Saimovici J, Pace N, Tros A, Plantalech L. ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES / Originals MORTALIDAD A LARGO PLAZO Y FACTORES PREDICTORES EN PACIENTES CON FRACTURA DE CADERA. Vol. 7, Actual. Osteol. 2011.
48. Huerfano E, Bautista M, Huerfano M, Nossa JM. Use of Surgical Approach Is Not Associated With Instability After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis Comparing Direct Anterior and Posterolateral Approaches. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2021 Nov 15;29(22):e1126–40.
49. Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Clark CR. A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013 May;28(5):849–54.
50. Finch DJ, Martin BI, Patricia Franklin MD, Magder LS, Pellegrini VD. Patient-reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Comparison Based on Surgical Approaches Patient-reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 1 Multicenter Comparison Based on Surgical Approaches 2. The Journal of Arthroplasty.
51. Bosker BH, Verheyen CCPM, Horstmann WG, Tulp NJA. Poor accuracy of freehand cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2007 Jul;127(5):375–9.
52. Hambright D, Hellman M, Barrack R, Knight J. Intra-operative digital imaging ASSURING THE ALIGNMENT OF COMPONENTS WHEN UNDERTAKING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
Antecedentes: Las fracturas de cadera intracapsulares son una lesión por fragilidad que afecta al adulto mayor. Actualmente se recomienda reemplazo total de cadera (RTC) el cual se puede realizar por diferentes abordajes quirúrgicos. El abordaje an
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::42a9a71da7a916813e28f2ddae134a4d
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/34523
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/34523
Publikováno v:
Revista Med; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2018): july-december; 36-43
Revista Med; Vol. 26 Núm. 2 (2018): julio-diciembre; 36-43
Revista Med; Vol. 26 Núm. 2 (2018): julio-diciembre; 36-43
Disease and hospitalization are stressful factors, institutions have a duty to comprehensively manage patients’ health. For this there are multiple complementary therapies such as laughter therapy. These are based on humor for health promotion and
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______2802::e67556a978f0b3403efd00d576a4b8c9
https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rmed/article/view/3370
https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rmed/article/view/3370
Autor:
Díaz Martínez, Sergio, Villán Gaona, Jorge Luciano, Vega Hurtado, Samuel, Pachón Barinas, Diana Patricia, Caballero Restrepo, Alberto Fabio
Publikováno v:
Revista Med; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2017): january-june; 58-63
Revista Med; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2017): enero-junio; 58-63
Revista Med; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2017): enero-junio; 58-63
Globicatella sanguinis is a rare pathogenic microorganism Gram-positive cocci and catalase negative, which although is isolated in sheep, has been described as infectious agent causing meningitis in humans. The first description of this pathogen was
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______2802::febfc92987fbfd032610c7a1238ee8ec
https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rmed/article/view/2918
https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rmed/article/view/2918
Autor:
DÍAZ MARTÍNEZ, SERGIO, VILLÁN GAONA, JORGE LUCIANO, VEGA HURTADO, SAMUEL, PACHÓN BARINAS, DIANA PATRICIA, CABALLERO RESTREPO, ALBERTO FABIO
Publikováno v:
Revista Med, Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 58-63, Published: JAN 2017
Globicatella sanguinis es un microorganismo patógeno poco común, coco Gram positivo y catalasa negativo, aunque se aísla en ganado ovino, ha sido descrito como agente infeccioso causante de meningitis en seres humanos. La primera descripción de e
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od_______618::b1809aa12718d22d52d29b9fd4d2692a
http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-52562017000100006&lng=en&tlng=en
http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-52562017000100006&lng=en&tlng=en