Zobrazeno 1 - 4
of 4
pro vyhledávání: '"Vicky G. Con-Chin"'
Autor:
Ana L. Valerín, Tetsuro Sugiura, Reinaldo Con-Wong, Vicky G. Con-Chin, Fernando Mena, Guillermo Echandi, Gil R. Con-Chin, Keijiro Araki, Hiroaki Takeuchi, Nobufumi Yasuda, Sergio A. Con, Fernando Brenes
Publikováno v:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 16:2631-2636
The detection of gastric premalignant lesions, atrophic gastritis, corpus atrophic gastritis, and intestinal metaplasia, using several potential markers was examined in Costa Rica. Depending on the lesion investigated, from a total of 223 dyspeptic p
Autor:
Fernando Brenes, Reinaldo Con-Wong, Ana L. Valerín, Mitsuaki Nishioka, Gil R. Con-Chin, Vicky G. Con-Chin, Keijiro Araki, Tetsuro Sugiura, Nobufumi Yasuda, Sergio A. Con, Fernando Mena, Hiroaki Takeuchi
Publikováno v:
Helicobacter. 12:547-552
Background: Associations between Helicobacter pylori gene diversity and gastric cancer have not been reported on in Costa Rica, despite its being one of the countries with the highest gastric cancer incidence and mortality rates in the world. The aim
Autor:
Mario Monge-Izaguirre, Gil R. Con-Chin, Keijiro Araki, Vicky G. Con-Chin, Mitsuaki Nishioka, Tetsuro Sugiura, Reinaldo Con-Wong, Norihito Morimoto, Hiroaki Takeuchi, Sergio A. Con, Guillermo Echandi, Fernando Brenes Pino, Michiya Kobayashi, U Fernando Mena, Ana L. Valerín, Sachiko N Yagi-Chaves
Publikováno v:
Journal of gastroenterology. 41(7)
We evaluated several risk factors for gastric cancer in Costa Rican regions having contrasting gastric cancer incidence rates, despite the small dimensions of the country.A total of 180 dyspeptic patients were classified into two groups according to
Autor:
Hiroaki Takeuchi, Gil R. Con-Chin, Sergio A. Con, Vicky G. Con-Chin, Nobufumi Yasuda, Reinaldo Con-Wong
Publikováno v:
World Journal of Gastroenterology. 15:211
To evaluate several risk factors for gastric cancer (GC) in Costa Rican regions with contrasting GC incidence rate (GCIR).According to GCIR, 191 Helicobacter pylori (H pylori)-positive patients were classified into groups A (high GCIR, n = 101) and B