Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 49
pro vyhledávání: '"Tim C. E. Engels"'
Publikováno v:
Quantitative Science Studies, Vol 2, Iss 1, Pp 65-88 (2021)
AbstractDespite the centrality of disciplinary classifications in bibliometric analyses, it is not well known how the choice of disciplinary classification influences bibliometric representations of research in the social sciences and humanities (SSH
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/5e8fbd6018e3464a9a544a2862f113d8
Publikováno v:
Quantitative Science Studies, Vol 2, Iss 1, Pp 89-110 (2021)
AbstractWe compare two supervised machine learning algorithms—Multinomial Naïve Bayes and Gradient Boosting—to classify social science articles using textual data. The high level of granularity of the classification scheme used and the possibili
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/d79ff8efdac14506a864572bba5b6705
Publikováno v:
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, Vol 6 (2022)
This article presents an analysis of the uptake of the GPRC label (Guaranteed Peer Reviewed Content label) since its introduction in 2010 until 2019. GPRC is a label for books that have been peer reviewed introduced by the Flemish publishers associat
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/29d29ab99e3b4ee3b028adb7a82c954c
Autor:
Emanuel Kulczycki, Ewa A. Rozkosz, Tim C. E. Engels, Raf Guns, Marek Hołowiecki, Janne Pölönen, Kinga Ciereszko
Publikováno v:
Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, Iss 1-2(53-54) (2019)
W tym artykule omawiamy etykiety z otwartymi danymi recenzentów, czyli praktykę ujawniania danych recenzentów w monografiach naukowych, która jest powszechna w krajach Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej. Celem badania było sprawdzenie, czy etykieta
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/994006f82bae458fb36e5e771acaa394
Publikováno v:
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, Vol 3 (2019)
This article presents a cohort analysis to study changes in the publication patterns of scholars working at a social sciences and humanities (SSH) university department or research unit in Flanders, Belgium. Starting from a comprehensive bibliographi
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/a4005a56ab66441493c90b40c08ae811
Publikováno v:
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, Vol 2 (2017)
This article compares six informetric approaches to determine cognitive distances between the publications of panel members (PMs) and those of research groups in discipline-specific research evaluation. We used data collected in the framework of six
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/e5568ca57ab04db0ba8a098ff62a1511
Publikováno v:
Scientometrics: an international journal for all quantitative aspects of the science of science and science policy
In this paper, we study how research topics and trends have evolved in the field of the science of team science (SciTS). Over the past 12 years, the International Science of Team Science conference has been making efforts to understand and enhance th
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::69849609b30fcaa82621d8cb7cf37ae0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04651-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04651-3
Publikováno v:
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
When quantifying the level of interdisciplinarity for scientific research, most established indicators employ a three-element diversity framework, namely variety, balance, and disparity, each of which captures a distinct but insufficient element. Amo
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::38a1c22689339b2691a6d5385e314520
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.498
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.498
Publikováno v:
Quantitative Science Studies (QSS)
Quantitative Science Studies
Quantitative Science Studies
Despite the centrality of disciplinary classifications in bibliometric analyses, it is not well known how the choice of disciplinary classification influences bibliometric representations of research in the social sciences and humanities (SSH). This
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::9d61a28a830f4014af98807066e6b557
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00110
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00110
Publikováno v:
Darbai ir Dienos
This study explores if there exists a European space of social sciences and humanities (SSH) scholarship in terms of journal use by focusing on journals that explicitly position themselves as Europe-oriented or internationally oriented. We analyze th
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d7958eaeb538a99a21d94df798b4ddf6
https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-8769.73.2
https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-8769.73.2