Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 11
pro vyhledávání: '"Sylwia Polberg"'
Publikováno v:
Argument & Computation, Pp 1-53 (2022)
Persuasion is an important and yet complex aspect of human intelligence. When undertaken through dialogue, the deployment of good arguments, and therefore counterarguments, clearly has a significant effect on the ability to be successful in persuasio
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/4ea14a86b1394aefb14af26702a2de6e
Publikováno v:
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 113:207-244
In an epistemic graph, belief in arguments is represented by probability distributions. Furthermore, the influence that belief in arguments can have on the belief in other arguments is represented by constraints on the probability distributions. Diff
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::88f474fe25b81f86cce95e4c9b1cfa01
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.07.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.07.006
Publikováno v:
Lecture Notes in Computer Science ISBN: 9783030297640
ECSQARU
15th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2019)
ECSQARU
15th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2019)
Probabilistic epistemic argumentation allows for reasoning about argumentation problems in a way that is well founded by probability theory. Epistemic states are represented by probability functions over possible worlds and can be adjusted to new bel
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::745d6ec295be568db89a5ae2114e1041
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_7
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_7
Autor:
Anthony Hunter, Sylwia Polberg
Publikováno v:
Lecture Notes in Computer Science ISBN: 9783030297640
ECSQARU
15th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2019)
ECSQARU
15th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2019)
Epistemic graphs are a recent proposal for probabilistic argumentation that allows for modelling an agent’s degree of belief in an argument and how belief in one argument may influence the belief in other arguments. These beliefs are represented by
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3585ceb7d96d4f896c64ce4c8b4057e4
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_5
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_5
Publikováno v:
KI 2019: Advances in Artificial Intelligence ISBN: 9783030301781
KI
KI
Computational persuasion aims to capture the human ability to persuade through argumentation for applications such as behaviour change in healthcare (e.g. persuading people to take more exercise or eat more healthily). In this paper, we review resear
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::63fc483074e311fb19df463c62466d07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30179-8_2
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30179-8_2
This paper introduces epistemic graphs as a generalization of the epistemic approach to probabilistic argumentation. In these graphs, an argument can be believed or disbelieved up to a given degree, thus providing a more fine--grained alternative to
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a57cc3d64601079f82bffd79813bf81e
Autor:
Sylwia Polberg, Anthony Hunter
Publikováno v:
ICTAI
For a participant to play persuasive arguments in a dialogue, s/he may create a model of the other participants. This may include an estimation of what arguments the other participants find believable, convincing, or appealing. The participant can th
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d5a8b3ac511c03d27519ae9c14f29cfc
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2017.00066
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2017.00066
Publikováno v:
Lecture Notes in Computer Science ISBN: 9783319675817
SUM
SUM
The epistemic approach to probabilistic argumentation as- signs belief to arguments. This is valuable in dialogical argumentation where one agent can model the beliefs another agent has in the argu ments and this can be harnessed to make strategic ch
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::6600f7336b2590ec64d359c1efa89917
https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/120621/1/belief_in_attacks.pdf
https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/120621/1/belief_in_attacks.pdf
Autor:
Sylwia Polberg
Publikováno v:
Logics in Artificial Intelligence ISBN: 9783319487571
JELIA
JELIA
Among the most general structures extending the framework by Dung are the abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs). They come equipped with various types of semantics, with the most prominent – the labeling–based one – being analyzed in the conte
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ece79c04291e9ee426b578f2d6cd1166
https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/120619/1/understanding_adfs.pdf
https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/120619/1/understanding_adfs.pdf
Autor:
Dragan Doder, Sylwia Polberg
Publikováno v:
Logics in Artificial Intelligence ISBN: 9783319115573
JELIA
JELIA
Although Dung's frameworks are widely approved tools for abstract argumentation, their abstractness makes expressing notions such as support or uncertainty very difficult. Thus, many of their generalizations were created, including the probabilistic
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::4939b6fbee7709d95d6de45ccf0b2420
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_42