Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 48
pro vyhledávání: '"Stijn Smet"'
Autor:
Stijn Smet
Publikováno v:
Oxford Journal of Law and Religion. 11:1-3
Autor:
Ellen Desmet, Stijn Smet
Publikováno v:
Migrants’ rights, populism and legal resilience in Europe
This chapter adopts a two-stage analysis of legal resilience against far-reaching restrictions of migrants’ rights. It first investigates the resilience of the Belgian constitutional system against potential hostile take-over by right-wing populist
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a15dcb99c38be8259f17964479613b16
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009040396.017
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009040396.017
Autor:
Stijn Smet
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
The principle of state neutrality vis-à-vis religion and belief is contested and illusive. Some scholars even label it an impossible principle. Nevertheless, the meanings and functions assigned to neutrality are often determinative of, among others,
Autor:
Julie Ringelheim, Stijn Smet
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Autor:
Stijn Smet, Mariusz Jagielski
Bringing together scholars of migration and constitutional law, this volume analyses the problematic relationship between the rise of populism, restrictions of migrants' rights and democratic decay in Europe. By offering both constructive and critica
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::84558dce0e002834bb6d7bd1444b8435
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37454
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37454
Autor:
Stijn Smet, Julie Ringelheim
Publikováno v:
Stijn Smet
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::cce1d12ff9d8818f2ee77387b1eec574
https://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/271779
https://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/271779
Autor:
Stijn Smet
Publikováno v:
International Legal Materials. 58:628-645
In E.S. v. Austria, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that a criminal conviction for making disparaging comments about the Prophet Muhammad, intimating in particular that he was a pedophile, did not violate the speaker's right to freedom of ex