Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 118
pro vyhledávání: '"Steven D. Penrod"'
Autor:
Jungwon Lee, Steven D. Penrod
Publikováno v:
Applied Cognitive Psychology. 36:1106-1130
Publikováno v:
Psychology, Crime & Law. 28:215-245
Although eyewitness researchers have used mock-witness measures to assess aspects of lineup fairness, they have paid little attention to their validity. The current study tested predictive validity...
Publikováno v:
THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY. 11:37-61
Publikováno v:
Psychiatr Psychol Law
A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision recognized the difficulty jurors have with evaluating eyewitness evidence. This decision resulted in the development of instructions that highlight factors affecting identification accuracy. Research has exp
Publikováno v:
Race and Social Problems. 11:253-267
Prior studies investigating racial bias in legal decisions have involved race combinations of an observer, defendant, and victim where the observers’ race was the same as either the defendants’ or victims’ race. Because of the research designs
Autor:
Steven D. Penrod, Angela M. Jones
Publikováno v:
Psychology, Crime & Law. 24:177-193
Eyewitness identifications made under poor witnessing or identification conditions have resulted in numerous wrongful convictions [National Registry of Exonerations. (2017). Retrieved January 28, 2...
Autor:
Angela M. Jones, Steven D. Penrod
Publikováno v:
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 25:257-272
Evidence is mixed on whether or not laypersons have sufficient knowledge of false confession risk factors. Procedural safeguards such as judicial instructions may assist jurors who are unable to effectively evaluate confession evidence. Participants
Publikováno v:
Psychology, Crime & Law. 24:14-37
Suspects accused of involvement in the same crime can be tried in one multiple-defendant trial. While research has long demonstrated the difficulties of being a juror, no published work has examined whether multiple-defendant trials compound these di
Publikováno v:
Journal of Experimental Criminology. 13:29-52
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently determined that jurors may not be able to effectively evaluate eyewitness evidence on their own. As a result, the Court proposed the use of judicial instructions to assist jurors (called Henderson instructions) a
Publikováno v:
Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. 17:1-24
Mistaken eyewitness identifications are a leading cause of wrongful convictions. Even with procedural safeguards (e.g., attorney argument, cross-examination of witnesses) in place, jurors still have difficulty evaluating the reliability of eyewitness