Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 66
pro vyhledávání: '"Sharon Bailin"'
Autor:
Sharon Bailin
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 23, Iss 1 (2004)
Rorty claims argument is inherently conservative and philosophical progress comes from "sparkling new ideas," not argument. This assumes an untenable opposition between the generation and the evaluation of ideas, with argument relegated to evaluation
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/cda9b176acfa44ec8d5cb8b4948c9c38
Autor:
Sharon Bailin
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 19, Iss 2 (1999)
Most current conceptions of critical thinking conceive of critical thinking in terms of abilities and dispositions. In this paper I describe a common type of problem students experience with critical thinking and argue that conceptualizations in term
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/fee5bb52ed4748a4949484bc881a96d0
Autor:
Sharon Bailin
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 16, Iss 3 (1994)
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/66f496b7ba7744febddb786b1d29995b
Autor:
Sharon Bailin
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 9, Iss 1 (1987)
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/42e9762f7e504771a4ea88533a8e0528
Autor:
Sharon Bailin and, Jon Young
Publikováno v:
Paideusis. 4:39-44
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::46c040cb9be686a93f6408d4e2b3d3fa
https://doi.org/10.7202/1073394ar
https://doi.org/10.7202/1073394ar
Autor:
Sharon Bailin
Publikováno v:
Paideusis. 5:39-43
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a68d03de3c63d24f2b5a084e14074370
https://doi.org/10.7202/1073350ar
https://doi.org/10.7202/1073350ar
Autor:
Mark Battersby, Sharon Bailin
Publikováno v:
OSSA Conference Archive
There has been considerable recent debate regarding the possible epistemic benefits versus the potential risks of adversariality in argumentation. Nonetheless, this debate has rarely found its way into work on critical thinking theory and instruction
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::aa945e460c0b2d26aacf91183463666c
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-020-09713-2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-020-09713-2
Autor:
Sharon Bailin, Mark Battersby
Publikováno v:
The Pandemic of Argumentation ISBN: 9783030910167
The original version of the book was inadvertently published with an incorrect chapter title as "Inoculating students again conspiracy theories: The case of Covid-19". It has now been corrected as "Inoculating students against conspiracy theories: Th
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::2a9d0f4224f2d9ba44bbd944aa94ed47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_19
Autor:
Sharon Bailin, Mark Battersby
Publikováno v:
The Pandemic of Argumentation ISBN: 9783030910167
Posing a significant danger to society are conspiracy theories, particularly those regarding the Covid-19 pandemic. This paper argues for the crucial role of critical thinking education in ‘inoculating’ students against conspiracy theories and ou
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::2ec104a3a99871df85f6950cbdec7f4e
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_14
There are numerous definitions of critical thinking, but the core concept has been said to be careful, reasoned, goal-directed thinking. There are also many conceptualizations of critical thinking, which are generally more detailed than brief definit
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a6f7f096dbd1085b1ebc0e563cc48c78
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1179
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1179