Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 11
pro vyhledávání: '"Shane Littrell"'
Autor:
Adam Enders, Casey Klofstad, Amanda Diekman, Hugo Drochon, Joel Rogers de Waal, Shane Littrell, Kamal Premaratne, Daniel Verdear, Stefan Wuchty, Joseph Uscinski
Publikováno v:
Scientific Reports, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2024)
Abstract Despite hundreds of studies examining belief in conspiracy theories, it is still unclear who—demographically—is most likely to believe such theories. To remedy this knowledge gap, we examine survey data containing various operationalizat
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/83c410bd87534de584560ec174b2a863
There exists a large body of work examining individual differences in the propensity to engage in reflective thinking processes. However, there is a distinct lack of empirical research examining the role of dispositional factors in these differences
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::02894529d08b6fd3731fc567cd0f3034
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4asw5
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4asw5
The extent to which a person engages in reflective thinking while problem-solving is often measured using the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005). Some past research has attributed poorer performance on the CRT to impulsiveness, which is
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a3a4269736e766ce38460e6d3ead0e5f
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8zk32
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8zk32
Publikováno v:
British Journal of Social Psychology. 60:1484-1505
Research into both receptivity to falling for bullshit and the propensity to produce it have recently emerged as active, independent areas of inquiry into the spread of misleading information. However, it remains unclear whether those who frequently
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::791bdfb38900a9620e7e38bbb593c925
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12447
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12447
Recent literature has identified and examined the construct of bullshit as a notable threat to the promulgation and use of accurate information. The parallel challenges posed by increasing availability of unfiltered online information have been ident
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::551a957a35d2e4e0008cdfa5f2a17cc8
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7t2my
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7t2my
Across four studies (N = 818), we present evidence that engaging in guided, explanatory reflection reduces receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit but not scientific bullshit or fake news. We also found robust effects of source credibility, in that r
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::d25665fb095ed4139664534e7420fbdd
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4bstf
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4bstf
Publikováno v:
Thinking & Reasoning. 26:352-380
There exists a large body of work examining individual differences in the propensity to engage in reflective thinking processes. However, there is a distinct lack of empirical research examining th...
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::bbfc57759edad3d0f06987e91ecc092e
https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1633404
https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1633404
Autor:
Shane Littrell, Jonathan A. Fugelsang
The growing prevalence of misinformation (i.e., bullshit) in society carries with it an increased need to understand the processes underlying many people’s susceptibility to falling for it. Here we report two studies (N = 412) examining the associa
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::85c947f99397c682b5f95a40395a958f
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kbfrz
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kbfrz
Research into both receptivity to falling for bullshit and the propensity to produce it have recently emerged as active, independent areas of inquiry into the spread of misinformation. However, it remains unclear whether those who frequently produce
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::ee79f0d4056fe0e542ff930d90362a1b
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5c2ej
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5c2ej
Publikováno v:
The British journal of social psychologyReferences. 60(1)
Recent psychological research has identified important individual differences associated with receptivity to bullshit, which has greatly enhanced our understanding of the processes behind susceptibility to pseudo-profound or otherwise misleading info
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::c437b2dfa6eac16ec965708d72f1a821
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32304103
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32304103