Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 20
pro vyhledávání: '"Serge P J M Horbach"'
Publikováno v:
PLoS Biology, Vol 21, Iss 10, p e3002255 (2023)
Open Peer Review is gaining prominence in attention and use, but to responsibly open up peer review, there is an urgent need for additional evidence. Here, we propose a preliminary research agenda and issue a call to action.
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/d072969d3c1c4105a1e0fb36f8ec3bc9
Autor:
Serge P J M Horbach, Lex M Bouter, George Gaskell, Maura Hiney, Panagiotis Kavouras, Niels Mejlgaard, Nick Allum, Noémie Aubert Bonn, Anna-Kathrine Bendtsen, Costas A Charitidis, Nik Claesen, Kris Dierickx, Anna Domaradzka, Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Nicole Föger, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Teodora Konach, Krishma Labib, Ana Marušić, Daniel Pizzolato, Tine Ravn, Rea Roje, Mads P Sørensen, Borana Taraj, Giuseppe A Veltri, Joeri K Tijdink
Publikováno v:
PLoS Biology, Vol 20, Iss 8, p e3001773 (2022)
Various stakeholders in science have put research integrity high on their agenda. Among them, research funders are prominently placed to foster research integrity by requiring that the organizations and individual researchers they support make an exp
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/c140614342044ce4bbde4a30eaac9bf0
Autor:
Serge P J M Horbach, Willem Halffman
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 12, Iss 10, p e0186281 (2017)
While problems with cell line misidentification have been known for decades, an unknown number of published papers remains in circulation reporting on the wrong cells without warning or correction. Here we attempt to make a conservative estimate of t
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/011502c8acad480c8eb76709e663a4a2
Publikováno v:
Royal Society Open Science, Vol 9, Iss 10 (2022)
Transparency is increasingly becoming the new norm and modus operandi of the global research enterprise. In this mini-review, we summarize ongoing initiatives to increase transparency in science and funding in particular. Based on this, we make a ple
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/f0a699b0f59745798d2d98f241556a88
Publikováno v:
Horbach, S P J M 2023, ' Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review ', Research Integrity and Peer Review, vol. 8, 4 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5
Background The emergence of systems based on large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT has created a range of discussions in scholarly circles. Since LLMs generate grammatically correct and mostly relevant (yet sometimes outright wrong,
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a081a72e470dba841f5a5d49b4bf5fce
https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/fighting-reviewer-fatigue-or-amplifying-bias-considerations-and-recommendations-for-use-of-chatgpt-and-other-large-language-models-in-scholarly-peer-review(71244b69-7ef4-42d1-9eae-d401250c084d).html
https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/fighting-reviewer-fatigue-or-amplifying-bias-considerations-and-recommendations-for-use-of-chatgpt-and-other-large-language-models-in-scholarly-peer-review(71244b69-7ef4-42d1-9eae-d401250c084d).html
Publikováno v:
Horbach, S P J M, Sørensen, M P, Allum, N & Reid, A-K 2023, ' Disentangling the local context—imagined communities and researchers’ sense of belonging ', Science and Public Policy . https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad017
It is generally agreed that researchers’ ‘local context’ matters to the successful implementation of research integrity policies. However, it often remains unclear what the relevant local context is. Is it the institutions and immediate working
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d3dd0622a98e5ea992a8eff08f40678d
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad017
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad017
Debates about appropriate, fair and effective ways of assessing research and researchers have raged through the scientific community for decades, recently mostly concerned with discussing the merits and limitations of metric-based, quantitative asses
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::65b02c1a93fd343fe073190ef712f710
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/e5uyv
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/e5uyv
Autor:
Nick Allum, Abigail Reid, Miriam Bidoglia, George Gaskell, Noémie Aubert Bonn, Ivan Buljan, Simon Fuglsang, Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Panagiotis Kavouras, Ana Marusic, Niels Mejlgaard, Daniel Pizzolato, Rea Roje, Joeri K. Tijdink, Giuseppe Alessandro Veltri
Publikováno v:
F1000Research, 12:187. F1000 Research Ltd.
Allum, N, Reid, A, Bidoglia, M, Gaskell, G, Aubert-Bonn, N, Buljan, I, Fuglsang, S, Horbach, S, Kavouras, P, Marušić, A, Mejlgaard, N, Pizzolato, D, Roje, R, Tijdink, J & Veltri, G 2023, ' Researchers on research integrity : a survey of European and American researchers ', F1000Research, vol. 12, 187 . https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128733.1
Allum, N, Reid, A, Bidoglia, M, Gaskell, G, Aubert-Bonn, N, Buljan, I, Fuglsang, S, Horbach, S, Kavouras, P, Marušić, A, Mejlgaard, N, Pizzolato, D, Roje, R, Tijdink, J & Veltri, G 2023, ' Researchers on research integrity : a survey of European and American researchers ', F1000Research, vol. 12, pp. 187 . https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128733.1
Allum, N, Reid, A, Bidoglia, M, Gaskell, G, Aubert-Bonn, N, Buljan, I, Fuglsang, S, Horbach, S, Kavouras, P, Marušić, A, Mejlgaard, N, Pizzolato, D, Roje, R, Tijdink, J & Veltri, G 2023, ' Researchers on research integrity : a survey of European and American researchers ', F1000Research, vol. 12, 187 . https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128733.1
Allum, N, Reid, A, Bidoglia, M, Gaskell, G, Aubert-Bonn, N, Buljan, I, Fuglsang, S, Horbach, S, Kavouras, P, Marušić, A, Mejlgaard, N, Pizzolato, D, Roje, R, Tijdink, J & Veltri, G 2023, ' Researchers on research integrity : a survey of European and American researchers ', F1000Research, vol. 12, pp. 187 . https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128733.1
Background: Reports of questionable or detrimental research practices (QRPs) call into question the reliability of scientific evidence and the trustworthiness of research. A critical component of the research ecosystem is the organization within whic
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d389b66892968f69f7ef041a1c655c93
https://hdl.handle.net/11572/373548
https://hdl.handle.net/11572/373548
Diverse efforts are underway to reform the journal peer review system. Combined with growing interest in Open Science practices, Open Peer Review (OPR) has become of central concern to the scholarly community. However, what Open Peer Review is unders
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::cc47bd20e2aac900baf91a18d19b7fef
https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/r6t8p
https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/r6t8p
A response to the study by Huber et al. (1) studying status bias in journal peer review. We argue that double-anonymized peer review is not a progressive solution to this issue and opt for more open and collaborative publishing practices instead.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::00f7a7e27488d7f209e9832b24638a9d
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fqb5c
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fqb5c