Zobrazeno 1 - 6
of 6
pro vyhledávání: '"Sehrang Joo"'
Publikováno v:
Mind & Language. 38:20-41
People often think of objects teleologically. For instance, we might understand a hammer in terms of its purpose of driving in nails. But how should we understand teleological thinking in the first place? This paper separates mere teleology (simply a
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::278fa13cf0ca6a2e63fd74d8af8c4892
https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12393
https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12393
Autor:
Sehrang Joo, Sami Ryan Yousif
Publikováno v:
Cognitive scienceReferences. 46(11)
People may conceptualize certain categories as held together by a category-specific ‘essence’—some un- observable, critical feature that causes the external features of a category to emerge. Yet there remains an open question about what compris
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::9ea0424c49a3bdc523f24f7465561300
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36353950
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36353950
Publikováno v:
Cognitive Science. 46
Adults and children 'promiscuously' endorse teleological answers to 'why' questions-a tendency linked to arguments that humans are intuitively theistic and naturally unscientific. But how do people arrive at an endorsement of a teleological answer? H
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::c7af667e0ce077eb28f90827559b67a8
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13091
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13091
No privileged link between intentionality and causation: Generalizable effects of agency in language
Publikováno v:
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol 44, iss 44
Consider a causal claim like “Tom caused the train delay.” Previous research has shown that the extent to which Tom is seen to act intentionally (i.e., through his own agency) affects the extent to which people agree with this claim. But is this
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::b51b955061ca0ce58792b6b46fd54404
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0wd6k823
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0wd6k823
Parallel research programs across decades have developed contrasting accounts of people’s explanation preferences. One perspective emphasizes adults’ and children’s preferences for teleological explanations (i.e., explanations referring to some
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::83f687793eecd465dbf87e29b3e656f3
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qczb7
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qczb7
Adults and children ‘promiscuously’ endorse teleological answers to ‘why’ questions, a tendency linked to arguments that humans are natively theistic and intuitively unscientific. But what are people doing when they endorse a teleological ans
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b837a9aacd5d02b7a24ce4bc1417f048
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ma8b2
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ma8b2