Zobrazeno 1 - 4
of 4
pro vyhledávání: '"Sarah E. Nason"'
Autor:
Tenal Bourchier, Jessica A. Haines, Murray M. Humphries, Ben Dantzer, Jamieson C. Gorrell, Andrew G. McAdam, Amanda D. Kelley, Jeffrey E. Lane, Stan Boutin, David W. Coltman, Sarah E. Nason, Ryan W. Taylor, Anni Hämäläinen, Alyshia M.M. Skurdal
Publikováno v:
Animal Behaviour. 167:23-39
This is a manuscript version of an article published as: Haines, J.A., Nason, S.E., Skurdal, A.M.M., Bourchier, T., Boutin, S., Taylor, R.W., McAdam, A.G., Lane, J.E., Kelley, A.D., Humphries, M.M., Gorrell, J.C., Dantzer, B., Coltman, D.W., & Hämä
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::41b47109e9b47c02259e81d65f54aa9a
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.06.013
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.06.013
Autor:
Sarah E. Nason, Clint D. Kelly
Publikováno v:
Animal Behaviour. 164:65-72
Mating with multiple partners is common across animal taxa. Males mate multiply because reproductive success positively correlates with mating success. In contrast, multiple mating is expected to increase the direct (material) or indirect (genetic) b
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::437c962a84c63263f727bcc232d75667
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.03.018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.03.018
Autor:
Sarah E. Nason, Clint D. Kelly
Publikováno v:
Proc Biol Sci
Alternative mating strategies are widespread among animal taxa, with strategies controlled by a genetic polymorphism (Mendelian strategy) being rarer in nature than condition-dependent developmental strategies. Mendelian strategies are predicted to h
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::fa36a0cf0d35cacd94c05069b70ad6df
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33043864
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33043864
Autor:
Natasha A. Lloyd, Clint D. Kelly, Sarah E. Nason, Sarah E. Dalrymple, Typhenn A. Brichieri‐Colombi, Axel Moehrenschlager
Systematic literature reviews are frequently used in biodiversity conservation to identify knowledge gaps and strategies for improvement. Despite their important role, systematic reviews are not standardized and often use different methods, standards
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0404385a11317c24dac8285e088fc5c0
https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/14303/1/1-s2.0-S0006320720310065-main.pdf
https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/14303/1/1-s2.0-S0006320720310065-main.pdf
