Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 13
pro vyhledávání: '"Sara Tasnim"'
Autor:
Jacqueline Thompson, Andrea C Tricco, Dawid Pieper, Salmaan Kanji, Yuan Chi, Sera Whitelaw, Carole Lunny, Emma Reid, Sai Surabi Thirugnanasampanthar, Nicola Ferri, Pierre Thabet, Sara Tasnim, Harrison Nelson, Jia He (Janet) Zhang, Banveer Kalkat, Reema Abdoulrezzak, Di Wen (Wendy) Zheng, Lindy Pangka, Dian (Xin Ran) Wang, Parisa Safavi, Anmol Sooch, Kevin Kang
Publikováno v:
BMJ Open, Vol 12, Iss 4 (2022)
Introduction An increasing growth of systematic reviews (SRs) presents notable challenges for decision-makers seeking to answer clinical questions. In 1997, an algorithm was created by Jadad to assess discordance in results across SRs on the same que
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/c1cfba5bfdec4f299251a6287e160890
Publikováno v:
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Vol 2, Iss 2, Pp 48-53 (2011)
Methamphetamine (MA) is a highly addictive psychostimulant drug with crucial impacts on individuals on various levels. Exposure to methamphetamine-associated cues in laboratory can elicit measureable craving and autonomic reactivity in most individua
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/31d8a204c64541729e4acdd9187244c0
Publikováno v:
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Vol 2, Iss 2, Pp 48-53 (2011)
Methamphetamine (MA) is a highly addictive psychostimulant drug with crucial impacts on individuals on various levels. Exposure to methamphetamine-associated cues in laboratory can elicit measureable craving and autonomic reactivity in most individua
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/ac8d3d119065411291e2a09574251a53
Autor:
Carole Lunny, Emma K. Reid, Trish Neelakant, Alyssa Chen, Jia He Zhang, Gavindeep Shinger, Adrienne Stevens, Sara Tasnim, Shadi Sadeghipouya, Stephen Adams, Yi Wen Zheng, Lester Lin, Pei Hsuan Yang, Manpreet Dosanjh, Peter Ngsee, Ursula Ellis, Beverley J. Shea, James M. Wright
Publikováno v:
Research Synthesis Methods. 13:315-329
Background Multiple ‘overviews of reviews’ conducted on the same topic (“overlapping overviews”) represent a waste of research resources and can confuse clinicians making decisions amongst competing treatments. We aimed to assess the frequenc
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::06e31637016e3a5ff0913be7dbd4a9ce
https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1542
https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1542
Autor:
Carole Lunny, Sai Surabi Thirugnanasampanthar, Salmaan Kanji, Nicola Ferri, Pierre Thabet, Dawid Pieper, Sara Tasnim, Harrison Nelson, Emma Reid, Jia He (Janet) Zhang, Banveer Kalkat, Yuan Chi, Jacqueline Thompson, Reema Abdoulrezzak, Di Wen (Wendy) Zheng, Lindy Pangka, Dian (Xin Ran) Wang, Parisa Safavi, Anmol Sooch, Kevin Kang, Sera Whitelaw, Andrea C Tricco
Publikováno v:
BMJ open. 12(4)
Introduction: An increasing growth of systematic reviews (SRs) presents notable challenges for decision-makers seeking to answer clinical questions. In 1997, an algorithm was created by Jadad to assess discordance in results across SRs on the same qu
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::87883d4dc4d1efb65d986f11e70537ba
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35443948
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35443948
Autor:
Emma K. Reid, Jia He Zhang, Gavindeep Shinger, Sara Tasnim, Alyssa Chen, Lester Lin, Peter Ngsee, Yi Wen Zheng, Stephen P. Adams, Pei Hsuan Yang, Shadi Sadeghipouya, Ursula Ellis, Manpreet Dosanjh, Adrienne Stevens, Beverley Shea, James M Wright, Trish Neelakant, Carole Lunny
Background Multiple ‘overviews of reviews’ conducted on the same topic (“overlapping overviews”) represent a waste of research resources, and can confuse clinicians who are required to choose among competing treatments. We aimed to assess the
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::df4c5a96edd279b89ebcf71273f0eaa7
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-665009/v3
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-665009/v3
Autor:
Peter Ngsee, Manpreet Dosanjh, Adrienne Stevens, Stephen P. Adams, Lester Lin, Ursula Ellis, Shadi Sadeghipouya, Sara Tasnim, Carole Lunny, James M Wright, Trish Neelakant, Emma K. Reid, Beverley Shea, Gavindeep Shinger, Alyssa Chen, Pei Hsuan Yang, Yi Wen Zheng
Publikováno v:
Research synthesis methodsREFERENCES. 13(1)
Overviews synthesising the results of multiple systematic reviews help inform evidence-based clinical practice. In this first of two companion papers, we evaluate the bibliometrics of overviews, including their prevalence and factors affecting citati
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::4caf56e60138fcbe3c1b0d49e9aeee20
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34628727
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34628727
Autor:
Peter Ngsee, Sara Tasnim, James M Wright, Shadi Sadeghipouya, Yi Wen Zheng, Alyssa Chen, Carole Lunny, Stephen P. Adams, Ursula Ellis, Emma K. Reid, Adrienne Stevens, Pei Hsuan Yang, Jia He Zhang, Lester Lin, Gavindeep Shinger, Beverley Shea, Manpreet Dosanjh, Trish Neelakant
Background Multiple overviews of systematic reviews conducted on the same topic (“overlapping overviews”) represent a waste of research resources and can confuse or mislead clinicians and policymakers. We aimed to assess the frequency and charact
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::6809042b410e179872f0353a9aa38555
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-665009/v1
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-665009/v1
Autor:
Carole Lunny, Trish Neelakant, Alyssa Chen, Gavindeep Shinger, Adrienne Stevens, Sara Tasnim, Shadi Sadeghipouya, Stephen Adams, Yi Wen Zheng, Lester Lin, Pei Hsuan Yang, Manpreet Dosanjh, Peter Ngsee, Ursula Ellis, Beverley J. Shea, Emma K. Reid, James M. Wright
Background: Overviews synthesising the results of multiple systematic reviews help inform evidence-based clinical practice. In this first of two companion papers, we evaluate the bibliometrics of overviews, including their prevalence and factors affe
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::fe8330b0df56b9aa486a987a1d1b85c5
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-237881/v2
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-237881/v2
Autor:
Peter Ngsee, Stephen P. Adams, Ursula Ellis, Trish Neelakant, James M Wright, Alyssa Chen, Carole Lunny, Pei Hsuan Yang, Shadi Sadeghipouya, Manpreet Dosanjh, Yi Wen Zheng, Lester Lin, Beverley Shea, Adrienne Stevens, Emma K. Reid, Gavindeep Shinger, Sara Tasnim
Background: Overviews synthesizing the results of multiple systematic reviews help inform evidence-based clinical practice. In this first of two companion papers, we evaluate the bibliometrics of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’, including their
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9b682809b8425c42a541a93a74077f55
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-237881/v1
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-237881/v1