Zobrazeno 1 - 8
of 8
pro vyhledávání: '"Saniye Vatansever"'
Autor:
Saniye Vatansever
Publikováno v:
Eskiyeni, Iss 48, Pp 29-51 (2023)
İntiharın ahlaka uygun ve hatta kimi zaman ahlaken iyi olduğunu kabul eden Stoacı anlayışa zıt olarak Kant intiharın hiçbir durumda ahlaka uygun olamayacağını savunur. Bu çalışmada Kant’ın intihar üzerine görüşleri derlenerek, i
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/f2b59f8fb27641ecbf70d0ca26af789e
Autor:
Saniye VATANSEVER
Publikováno v:
Eskiyeni. :29-51
İntiharın ahlaka uygun ve hatta kimi zaman ahlaken iyi olduğunu kabul eden Stoacı anlayışa zıt olarak Kant intiharın hiçbir durumda ahlaka uygun olamayacağını savunur. Bu çalışmada Kant’ın intihar üzerine görüşleri derlenerek, i
Autor:
Saniye VATANSEVER
Publikováno v:
Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi.
Kant defines the enlightenment of the individual as emergence of the individual from a self-inflicted immaturity. In this definition, individuals who are not enlightened are held responsible for their failures. This is because Kant, in this text, imp
Autor:
Saniye Vatansever
Publikováno v:
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy. 10:451-468
Autor:
Saniye Vatansever
Publikováno v:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
In the second Critique, Kant argues that for the highest good to be possible we need to postulate the existence of God and the immortality of the soul in a future world. In his other writings, however, he suggests that the highest good is attainable
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::e55af9383509178d9b281a82d19e092f
https://hdl.handle.net/11693/75888
https://hdl.handle.net/11693/75888
Autor:
Saniye Vatansever
Publikováno v:
Natur und Freiheit ISBN: 9783110467888
Natur und Freiheit
Natur und Freiheit
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::03c3a92c5365dd3374865a3b1417d34f
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110467888-259
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110467888-259
Autor:
Saniye Vatansever
Publikováno v:
HOPOS (The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science)
Saniye Vatansever
Saniye Vatansever
This article presents a critical analysis of two influential readings of Kant’s Second Analogy, namely, Gerd Buchdahl’s “modest reading” and Michael Friedman’s “strong reading.” After pointing out the textual and philosophical problems
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::cd31db55a0f6852c978c39a8bcfbd42f
https://hdl.handle.net/11693/50110
https://hdl.handle.net/11693/50110
Autor:
Saniye Vatansever
Publikováno v:
Saniye Vatansever
This paper attempts to resolve the apparent conflict between Descartes’ commitments to the creation doctrine and the necessity of eternal truths by elaborating different conceptions of necessity in Descartes’ framework. More specifically, I argue