Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 734
pro vyhledávání: '"SHAH, NIHAR"'
The increasing volume of papers and proposals undergoing peer review emphasizes the pressing need for greater automation to effectively manage the growing scale. In this study, we present the deployment and evaluation of machine learning and optimiza
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10009
Autor:
Shah, Nihar
In many online domains, Sybil networks -- or cases where a single user assumes multiple identities -- is a pervasive feature. This complicates experiments, as off-the-shelf regression estimators at least assume known network topologies (if not fully
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.17426
Autor:
Kuznetsov, Ilia, Afzal, Osama Mohammed, Dercksen, Koen, Dycke, Nils, Goldberg, Alexander, Hope, Tom, Hovy, Dirk, Kummerfeld, Jonathan K., Lauscher, Anne, Leyton-Brown, Kevin, Lu, Sheng, Mausam, Mieskes, Margot, Névéol, Aurélie, Pruthi, Danish, Qu, Lizhen, Schwartz, Roy, Smith, Noah A., Solorio, Thamar, Wang, Jingyan, Zhu, Xiaodan, Rogers, Anna, Shah, Nihar B., Gurevych, Iryna
The number of scientific articles produced every year is growing rapidly. Providing quality control over them is crucial for scientists and, ultimately, for the public good. In modern science, this process is largely delegated to peer review -- a dis
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06563
Autor:
Rastogi, Charvi, Song, Xiangchen, Jin, Zhijing, Stelmakh, Ivan, Daumé III, Hal, Zhang, Kun, Shah, Nihar B.
Peer review often involves reviewers submitting their independent reviews, followed by a discussion among reviewers of each paper. A question among policymakers is whether the reviewers of a paper should be anonymous to each other during the discussi
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.01015
A major threat to the peer-review systems of computer science conferences is the existence of "collusion rings" between reviewers. In such collusion rings, reviewers who have also submitted their own papers to the conference work together to manipula
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07860
Autor:
Goldberg, Alexander, Stelmakh, Ivan, Cho, Kyunghyun, Oh, Alice, Agarwal, Alekh, Belgrave, Danielle, Shah, Nihar B.
Is it possible to reliably evaluate the quality of peer reviews? We study this question driven by two primary motivations -- incentivizing high-quality reviewing using assessed quality of reviews and measuring changes to review quality in experiments
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09497
Peer review frequently follows a process where reviewers first provide initial reviews, authors respond to these reviews, then reviewers update their reviews based on the authors' response. There is mixed evidence regarding whether this process is us
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05443
Autor:
Rao, Rithvik, Shah, Nihar
Triangle fees are a novel fee structure for AMMs, in which marginal fees are decreasing in a trade's size. That decline is proportional to the movement in the AMM's implied price, i.e. for every basis point the trade moves the ratio of assets, the ma
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.17316
Autor:
Liu, Ryan, Shah, Nihar B.
Given the rapid ascent of large language models (LLMs), we study the question: (How) can large language models help in reviewing of scientific papers or proposals? We first conduct some pilot studies where we find that (i) GPT-4 outperforms other LLM
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00622
Peer review assignment algorithms aim to match research papers to suitable expert reviewers, working to maximize the quality of the resulting reviews. A key challenge in designing effective assignment policies is evaluating how changes to the assignm
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17339