Zobrazeno 1 - 4
of 4
pro vyhledávání: '"S A W Bouwense"'
Publikováno v:
BMC Surgery, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2022)
Abstract Background Parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary diversion is an underestimated and undertreated clinical entity, which heavily impairs patients’ quality of life due to symptoms of pain, leakage, application or skin problems. As fo
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/9cb9e426ec654dde96c1e380eb6fb7bb
Publikováno v:
Leerboek acute geneeskunde ISBN: 9789036828048
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::602c41594bf6eedd7df250b94084808c
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2805-5_31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2805-5_31
Publikováno v:
Leerboek acute geneeskunde ISBN: 9789036818964
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::95494ba190da5be2d35a3971ca5aa2df
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1897-1_15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1897-1_15
Autor:
C C van Rossem, M D M Bolmers, M H F Schreinemacher, A A W van Geloven, W A Bemelman, G J D Acker, B Akkermans, G J M Akkersdijk, G D Algie, J H Allema, C S Andeweg, N Appeldorn, J G Baal, C M Bakker, S A L Bartels, C Berg, B Boekestijn, F C Boer, D Boerma, A L Boom, M C Boute, S A W Bouwense, J Bransen, F A Brussel, O R C Busch, S M M Castro, H A Cense, C Croese, T Dalen, I Dawson, E Dessel, R Dettmers, N Dhar, F Y M Dohmen, K W Dongen, P Duijvendijk, R R Dulfer, B J Dwars, J P Eerenberg, M Elst, E Ende, L M M Fassaert, J T Fikkers, J W Foppen, E J B Furnee, F P Garssen, M F Gerhards, H Goor, R R Gorter, J S Graaf, L J Graat, J Groote, A C Ham, J F Hamming, J T H Hamminga, E Harst, J Heemskerk, H A Heij, A Heijne, J T Heikens, E Heineman, R Hertogs, E Heurn, L C L Hil, A G M Hoofwijk, C C C Hulsker, D R M Hunen, M S Ibelings, J M Klaase, R Klicks, L Knaapen, R T J Kortekaas, F Kruyt, S Kwant, S S Lases, T Lettinga, A Loupatty, R A Matthijsen, R C Minnee, B Mirck, L Mitalas, D Moes, A M Moorman, V B Nieuwenhuijs, G A P Nieuwenhuijzen, P D Nijk, J M T Omloo, A G Ottenhof, H W Palamba, D L Peet, I T A Pereboom, P W Plaisier, A P T Ploeg, M H Raber, M M P J Reijnen, H Rijna, C Rosman, R M H Roumen, R F Schmitz, A P Schouten Velden, W H Schreurs, T A Sigterman, H J Smeets, D J A Sonneveld, M N Sosef, S F Spoor, L P S Stassen, L Steensel, E Stortelder, J Straatman, H J Susante, D E N M Suykerbuyk Hoog, C Terwisscha Scheltinga, B R Toorenvliet, B M Verbeek, P C M Verbeek, M Verseveld, J H Volders, M R Vriens, P W H E Vriens, B C Vrouenraets, B J M Wall, J A Wegdam, E Westerduin, J J Wever, N A T Wijffels, B P L Wijnhoven, T A Winkel, D C Zee, A M Zeillemaker, C Zietse
Publikováno v:
British Journal of Surgery, 103, 144-51
British journal of surgery, 103(1), 144-151. Wiley
British journal of surgery, 103(1), 144-151. John Wiley and Sons Ltd
Europe PubMed Central
British Journal of Surgery, 103, 1, pp. 144-51
British journal of surgery, 103(1), 144-151. Wiley
British journal of surgery, 103(1), 144-151. John Wiley and Sons Ltd
Europe PubMed Central
British Journal of Surgery, 103, 1, pp. 144-51
Background Studies comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy are difficult to interpret owing to several types of bias, and the results often seem of limited clinical importance. National audits can be valuable to provide insight into outcomes f