Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 133
pro vyhledávání: '"Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez"'
Publikováno v:
Scientometrics. 126:4277-4295
Scientific journals receive an increasing number of submissions and many of them will be desk rejected without receiving detailed feedback from reviewers. In fact, the number of desk rejections has risen dramatically in the last decade. In this paper
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0b08f68853f6315fac727b5c1f165531
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03918-x
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03918-x
Publikováno v:
Scientometrics. 126:3041-3061
In this paper, we study the reviewer’s compensation problem in the presence of quality standard considerations. We examine a typical scenario in which a journal has to match the uncertain manuscript quality with a specified quality standard, but it
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::cd39d7ab6d6a94e72bc5e6458bc8c68b
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03839-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03839-1
Publikováno v:
Scientometrics. 126:825-830
In a typical scenario in which a peer-reviewed journal has to match the uncertain manuscript’s quality with its quality standard, quality improvement is restricted by the journal’s quality standard. This is so because the reviewer usually seeks t
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1f72b82d4fe164e283b2323d29abd4c9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03693-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03693-1
Publikováno v:
Scientometrics. 124:2409-2431
At the peer review stage, a natural metric to measure the performance of the author is the quality of the revised manuscript, while a natural metric to measure the performance of the reviewer is the mismatch cost between the manuscript quality and th
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b9f683dd9ff85d1406593e881514425c
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03559-6
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03559-6
Publikováno v:
Scientometrics. 123:517-533
A reduction in reviewer’s recommendation quality may be caused by a limitation of time or cognitive overload that comes from the level of redundancy, contradiction and inconsistency in the research. Some adaptive mechanisms by reviewers who deal wi
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::60b833b74f876fb541f01558fbe7b51c
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03357-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03357-0
Publikováno v:
Scientometrics. 121:1685-1705
Authors may believe that having more information available about the research can help reviewers make better recommendations. However, too much information in a manuscript may create problems to the reviewers and may lead them to poorer recommendatio
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::626161a01892c9f9b05b1ea9bb8bb4e9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03270-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03270-1
Publikováno v:
Scientometrics. 121:1435-1445
How much does it cost to publish a research article in a scholarly journal? Different academic publishers have widely varying levels of publication fees to help to fund editorial and peer review administration. In this context, publishers of scientif
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::7b4427fb0fee1a22791047b4ffebb08b
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03231-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03231-8
Publikováno v:
Scientometrics. 120:1373-1385
The peer review system aims to be effective in separating unacceptable from acceptable manuscripts. However, a reviewer can distinguish them or not. If reviewers distinguish unacceptable from acceptable manuscripts they use a fine partition of catego
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::2c550631f5c89c6b107fb28672df913f
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03171-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03171-3
Publikováno v:
Scientometrics. 118:885-890
If scholars suffer from imperfect attention, they will not always cite the best paper on a particular topic. The most chosen scholarly works may merely be the most cited ones, not the best articles. Here, a paper is chosen when someone cites it, afte
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::51c60442600e13580a81ecc94351aea3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03008-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03008-z
Publikováno v:
Journal of Information Science. :016555152211165
In this article, we model and study a cooperative peer-review scenario in scholarly publishing. In this scenario, the peer-reviewed journals cooperate in the necessary investment for the peer-review system. However, the final decision on what to publ
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::cf6572190ceafaec98fada071a4417b2
https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221116521
https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221116521