Zobrazeno 1 - 7
of 7
pro vyhledávání: '"Richard B. Belzer"'
Autor:
Richard B. Belzer
Publikováno v:
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. 11:294-318
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has regulated drinking water since the 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Congress directed it to achieve three conflicting goals: (i) establish stringent nationwide standards, (ii) ensure that
Autor:
R. Jeffrey Lewis, Richard B. Belzer
Publikováno v:
Risk Analysis
Conventional spirometry produces measurement error by using repeatability criteria (RC) to discard acceptable data and terminating tests early when RC are met. These practices also implicitly assume that there is no variation across maneuvers within
Autor:
Kerry Krutilla, Arthur G. Fraas, Randall Lutter, W. Kip Viscusi, Brian F. Mannix, Stuart Shapiro, Louis Anthony Cox, John D. Graham, James K. Hammitt, Anne E. Smith, Glenn C. Blomquist, Susan E. Dudley, Peter D. Linquiti, Richard B. Belzer, George M. Gray, Timothy J. Brennan, Richard O. Zerbe, Christopher Carrigan, Joseph J. Cordes
Publikováno v:
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. 8:187-204
Regulatory impact analyses (RIAs) weigh the benefits of regulations against the burdens they impose and are invaluable tools for informing decision makers. We offer 10 tips for nonspecialist policymakers and interested stakeholders who will be readin
Autor:
Steven C. Lewis, D. Warner North, James S. Bus, Richard C. Pleus, Richard B. Belzer, Ercole L. Cavalieri
Publikováno v:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 51:1-5
This report provides a summary of the objectives, organization, structure and charge for the naphthalene state of the science symposium (NS3), Monterey, CA, October 9–12, 2006. A 1-day preliminary conference was held followed by a 3-day state of th
Autor:
Richard B. Belzer
Publikováno v:
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 12:96-103
Autor:
Richard B. Belzer
Publikováno v:
Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 72:137-148
Risk perception researchers frequently notice major discrepancies between expert judgment and lay opinion concerning the identity of ‘large’ risks. These discrepancies are particularly disconcerting because they lead to a significant misallocatio
Publikováno v:
Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences ISBN: 1402018959
Comparative risk assessment is usually performed to inform risk ranking and prioritization exercises. Here it is applied as an innovative tool for testing the scientific validity and reliability of a 2002 USEPA human health risk assessment of perchlo
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::586f08359e5a8e173ad979f064dd8efe
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2243-3_3
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2243-3_3