Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 20
pro vyhledávání: '"Reginald S Sheehan"'
Despite several decades of research on Supreme Court decision-making by specialists in judicial politics, there is no good answer to a key question: if each justice's behavior on the Court were motivated solely by some kind of “liberal” or “con
The first transnational comparative study of legal party capability theory Justice is supposed to be blind. Cynics will say they know better. But what do the facts say? This groundbreaking study provides objective, data-driven answers to long-standin
Publikováno v:
Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior ISBN: 9781315691527
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::bafe6e9a805ba33378c489535384457d
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315691527-15
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315691527-15
Autor:
Reginald S. Sheehan, Kirk A. Randazzo
Publikováno v:
Australian Journal of Political Science. 47:239-255
The authors examine the influence of party capability theory while controlling for legal-structural and doctrinal changes in the High Court. Based on their analysis of cases from 1970 to 2003, several notable conclusions emerge. The most interesting
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::4295ab50fd72513cc42c87716152cba3
https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2012.677000
https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2012.677000
Autor:
Reginald S. Sheehan, William M. Myers
Publikováno v:
Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 50:171-189
Institutional theory suggests that policy views of a Court in democratic regimes are never far out of line for long with the policy views of the dominant lawmaking majorities because of relatively regular turnover in the membership of the Court. The
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9a7d606b47fc9722019c9914152071a8
https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2012.671603
https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2012.671603
Autor:
Reginald S. Sheehan
Publikováno v:
Southeastern Political Review. 24:55-75
This study focuses on the relationship between the Solicitor General and the Supreme Court in cases involving the federal government as a direct party in litigation. Particular attention is given to the impact of presidential appointments on the succ
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::e5995ff6f24ca3f54d69a575ac206ab6
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.1996.tb00432.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.1996.tb00432.x
Publikováno v:
Experimental Economics. 11:315-335
This paper studies a situation wherein a set of voters choose between two alternatives in the presence of a payoff externality. Specifically, regardless of her intrinsic preference, a voter’s payoff is maximized should she vote for the alternative
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::7585288058d86c3d63683c43e05d3d0f
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9167-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9167-z
Autor:
William Mishler, Reginald S. Sheehan
Publikováno v:
The Journal of Politics. 58:169-200
Recent aggregate-level research on the United States Supreme Court suggests that shifting tides of public opinion can have important effects on Supreme Court decisions. Moreover, these effects can be both direct (i.e., unmediated by other institution
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::c4a7782bcc92957d9f95cb22f9e90a05
https://doi.org/10.2307/2960354
https://doi.org/10.2307/2960354
Publikováno v:
American Political Science Review. 88:711-724
In their 1993 article in this Review, William Mishler and Reginald Sheehan reported evidence of both direct and indirect impacts of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. Helmut Norpoth and Jeffrey Segal offer a methodological critique and in the
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8ed0fa61e7d2316589c80e586cfea600
https://doi.org/10.2307/2944805
https://doi.org/10.2307/2944805
Autor:
Reginald S. Sheehan, Donald R. Songer
Publikováno v:
Political Research Quarterly. 46:339-354
Over the past two decades there has been a rapid increase in the number of amicus curiae briefs filed in the Supreme Court. Some cases studied suggest that these briefs may have a substantial effect on the Supreme Court's decisions, but no systematic
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::2a66f302026b7f8a709984f82848bd33
https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600207
https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600207