Lessons from UNCITRAL for Reforming the South African Legal Framework Concerning Security Rights in Movable Property

Autor: Michel Marlize Koekemoer, Reghard Brits

Publikováno v: Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol 25 (2022)

This article analyses the South African legal framework governing security rights in movable property with the view to inspire law reform. The analysis is based on a comparison of the current South African framework with the UNCITRAL Legislative Guid

Externí odkaz: https://doaj.org/article/82acfc3236a34f06b4a85dcc2a020b36

The rights of municipalities under section 118 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act in the case of land expropriation

Autor: Chantelle Gladwin-Wood, Reghard Brits

Publikováno v: South African Law Journal. 139:340-364

This article analyses the impact of s 118 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 on the rights of a municipality when land in its jurisdiction is expropriated. First, the municipality’s right under s 118(1) to embargo the transfe

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::2173fc71ff807664f9554413007e7415
https://doi.org/10.47348/salj/v139/i2a5

Arbitrary Deprivation of an Unregistered Credit Provider's Right to Claim Restitution of Performance Rendered: Opperman v Boonzaaier (24887/2010) 2012 ZAWCHC 27 (17 April 2012) and National Credit Regulator v Opperman 2013 2 SA 1 (CC)

Autor: Reghard Brits

Publikováno v: Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol 16, Iss 4, Pp 421-471 (2013)

The Constitutional Court in National Credit Regulator v Opperman confirmed the Cape High Court's decision in Opperman v Boonzaaier to declare section 89(5)(c) of the National Credit Act unconstitutional. Therefore, the forfeiture to the state of an u

Externí odkaz: https://doaj.org/article/9152c9bbd7f148679cc1bd714a2e2594

Parate Executie Clause in Mortgage Bond Versus Post-Default Authority to Sell ‒ Business Partners Limited v Mahamba (4568/2016) [2019] ZAECGHC 17 (26 February 2019)

Autor: Reghard Brits

Publikováno v: Obiter. 41:175-185

The purpose of this note is to consider a case that came before a full bench of the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court in Grahamstown – namely, Business Partners Limited v Mahamba ((4568/2016) [2019] ZAECGHC 17 (26 February 2019)). The case to

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1d712b38dd9c26f8123ad132bec68217
https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v41i1.10557

The national credit act's remedies for reckless credit in the mortgage context

Autor: Reghard Brits

Publikováno v: Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad; Vol 21, No 1 (2018)
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol 21, Pp 1-34 (2018)
PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, Volume: 21, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-34, Published: 2018

The National Credit Act 34 of 2005 prohibits the granting of reckless credit and also provides for certain remedies that courts can grant to consumers who have fallen victim to reckless lending practices. Depending on the circumstances, these remedie

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a83493ab392b89eb21c2f2bfeb5a2774
https://www.ajol.info/index.php/pelj/article/view/165922