Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 26
pro vyhledávání: '"Rapberger, Anna"'
Peer review is an essential process to determine the quality of papers submitted to scientific conferences or journals. However, it is subjective and prone to biases. Several studies have been conducted to apply techniques from NLP to support peer re
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16813
The visualization of argumentation frameworks (AFs) is crucial for enabling a wide applicability of argumentative tools. However, their visualization is often considered only as an accompanying part of tools for computing semantics and standard graph
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05457
Causal discovery amounts to unearthing causal relationships amongst features in data. It is a crucial companion to causal inference, necessary to build scientific knowledge without resorting to expensive or impossible randomised control trials. In th
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11250
Autor:
Leofante, Francesco, Ayoobi, Hamed, Dejl, Adam, Freedman, Gabriel, Gorur, Deniz, Jiang, Junqi, Paulino-Passos, Guilherme, Rago, Antonio, Rapberger, Anna, Russo, Fabrizio, Yin, Xiang, Zhang, Dekai, Toni, Francesca
AI has become pervasive in recent years, but state-of-the-art approaches predominantly neglect the need for AI systems to be contestable. Instead, contestability is advocated by AI guidelines (e.g. by the OECD) and regulation of automated decision-ma
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10729
The relation between (a fragment of) assumption-based argumentation (ABA) and logic programs (LPs) under stable model semantics is well-studied. However, for obtaining this relation, the ABA framework needs to be restricted to being flat, i.e., a fra
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09415
Most existing computational tools for assumption-based argumentation (ABA) focus on so-called flat frameworks, disregarding the more general case. In this paper, we study an instantiation-based approach for reasoning in possibly non-flat ABA. We make
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11431
Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) is a well-known structured argumentation formalism, whereby arguments and attacks between them are drawn from rules, defeasible assumptions and their contraries. A common restriction imposed on ABA frameworks (ABA
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.12453
In this paper, we study the effect of preferences in abstract argumentation under a claim-centric perspective. Recent work has revealed that semantical and computational properties can change when reasoning is performed on claim-level rather than on
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13305
Autor:
Kiesel, Rafael, Rapberger, Anna
In the area of claim-based reasoning in abstract argumentation, a claim-based semantics is said to be concurrent in a given framework if all its variants yield the same extensions. In this note, we show that the concurrence problem with respect to na
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10445
Publikováno v:
In Artificial Intelligence November 2023 324
