Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 267
pro vyhledávání: '"ROTOLO, ANTONINO"'
Consistency of case bases is a way to avoid the problem of retrieving conflicting constraining precedents for new cases to be decided. However, in legal practice the consistency requirements for case bases may not be satisfied. As pointed out in (Bro
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10567
This paper examines how a notion of stable explanation developed elsewhere in Defeasible Logic can be expressed in the context of formal argumentation. With this done, we discuss the deontic meaning of this reconstruction and show how to build from a
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05156
Autor:
Rotolo, Antonino, author, Sartor, Giovanni, author
Publikováno v:
Philosophical Foundations of Private International Law, 2024.
Externí odkaz:
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192858771.003.0006
This paper brings together two lines of research: factor-based models of case-based reasoning (CBR) and the logical specification of classifiers. Logical approaches to classifiers capture the connection between features and outcomes in classifier sys
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11217
The use of meta-rules in logic, i.e., rules whose content includes other rules, has recently gained attention in the setting of non-monotonic reasoning: a first logical formalisation and efficient algorithms to compute the (meta)-extensions of such t
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12655
This paper presents an extension of Defeasible Deontic Logic to deal with the Pragmatic Oddity problem. The logic applies three general principles: (1) the Pragmatic Oddity problem must be solved within a general logical treatment of CTD reasoning; (
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.04553
Autor:
Governatori, Guido, Rotolo, Antonino
In this paper, we explore how, and if, free choice permission (FCP) can be accepted when we consider deontic conflicts between certain types of permissions and obligations. As is well known, FCP can license, under some minimal conditions, the derivat
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07696
Publikováno v:
International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - 2018
In this work, we enrich a formalism for argumentation by including a formal characterization of features related to the knowledge, in order to capture proper reasoning in legal domains. We add meta-data information to the arguments in the form of lab
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01966
Akademický článek
Tento výsledek nelze pro nepřihlášené uživatele zobrazit.
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.