Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 44
pro vyhledávání: '"R. S. Bluck"'
Autor:
R S Bluck
R. S. Bluck’s engaging volume provides an accessible introduction to the thought of Plato. In the first part of the book the author provides an account of the life of the philosopher, from Plato’s early years, through to the Academy, the first vi
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5b0961c04fd31e89f3449ba68af035b8
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203101650
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203101650
Autor:
R. S. Bluck
Publikováno v:
Phronesis. 4:5-11
I N Phronesis iii (i 95S8) pp. 40 sq. Mr. K. W. Mills criticizes the view which I expressed in Phronesis ii (1957) pp. 117 sq., that Plato is unlikely to have thought of the Form of Equal as consisting of two or more equal things, and I should like t
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::38c0967656ea2cfa27872305b2c2c4d3
https://doi.org/10.1163/156852859x00029
https://doi.org/10.1163/156852859x00029
Autor:
R. S. Bluck
Publikováno v:
Phronesis. 6:94-101
Preface Introduction 1. The argument of the Meno 2. 'Recollection' in other dialogues 3. Transmigration and 'recollection' before Plato 4. The hypothetical method 5. The date of the Meno 6. The setting and the characters 7. The evidence for the text
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::c0818af93ceed3a40595e4f7a106db62
https://doi.org/10.1163/156852861x00125
https://doi.org/10.1163/156852861x00125
Autor:
R. S. Bluck
Publikováno v:
The Classical Quarterly. 6:29-37
In a recent article in the Philosophical Review (lxiii [1954], 319 ff.) Professor Gregory Vlastos has given an acute analysis of the ‘Third Man’ Argument as it appears in the Parmenides for which all Platonic scholars will be grateful. In view of
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::7ecb3db11d10f7342c563c8b6748f4cd
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800014944
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800014944
Autor:
R. S. Bluck
Publikováno v:
Phronesis. 5:140-151
M R STANNARD is certainly right in his claim (Phronesis v [i 960] 53 sq.) that the reason given by the writer of' Ep. 1I for going to Syracuse, tvo pLOL TL'u that they are not inconsistent with passages adduced by Bury; and that Plato was not unconce
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a5f4a82a9898663b8e148aa7d01e3116
https://doi.org/10.1163/156852860x00063
https://doi.org/10.1163/156852860x00063
Autor:
R. S. Bluck
Publikováno v:
The Classical Quarterly. 13:214-222
Chapters 12 and 13 of the De Interpretations present some puzzles, which it is my purpose to try to solve. The latest commentator, Professor Jaakke Hintikka, attempts in Acta Philosophica Fennica xiv (1962), 5–22, to abolish the difficulties by tak
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::2d96bcfb92fa5351ab0e5b8058da6f58
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800001816
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800001816
Autor:
R. S. Bluck
Publikováno v:
The Classical Quarterly. 3:46-52
The arguments usually propounded to show that the Greater Alcibiades was not written by Plato seem to me, by themselves, inconclusive. I believe that it would be better to begin by arguing (whether we retain the doubtfully authentic lines at 133 c or
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b88b54aa84e4bcf7ba11503b26d0b670
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800002597
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800002597
Autor:
R. S. Bluck
Publikováno v:
Mind. 65:522-529
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0b7e505721e14caf2853a31215d51372
https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/65.1.522
https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/65.1.522