Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 14
pro vyhledávání: '"Prokop Sousedík"'
Autor:
Prokop Sousedík
Publikováno v:
Acta Universitatis Carolinae Theologica, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 151-170 (2014)
The author of the essay reflects two possible approaches towards epistemology. First approach, according to him, originates in the Antiquity and Middle Ages; its systematic form can be also encountered in the contemporary analytical philosophy. The o
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/17f338ca62ab48339204d573965abd42
Throughout the greater part of the twentieth century, both in the analytic and continental traditions, metaphysics was deemed to be passé. The last few decades, however, have witnessed a remarkable growth of interest among analytic philosophers in v
Publikováno v:
Philosophia Mathematica. 27:299-302
Autor:
Prokop Sousedík
Publikováno v:
Studia Neoaristotelica. 16:79-108
The author shows that Aquinas’s treatise on the Trinity can be viewed in two ways. According to the first, now prevailing opinion, the thoughts of the Angelic Doctor are too speculative and in essence they harm our personal relationship with God. H
Autor:
David Svoboda, Prokop Sousedík
Publikováno v:
Studia Neoaristotelica. 16:307-329
According to formalism, a mathematician is not concerned with mysterious metaphysical entities but with mathematical symbols. As a result, mathematical entities become simply sensible signs. However, the price that has to be paid for this move seems
Autor:
David Svoboda, Prokop Sousedík
Publikováno v:
Studia Neoaristotelica. 14:19-36
Autor:
David Svoboda, Prokop Sousedík
Publikováno v:
Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5db8879a3e512e9d7b63946dd4cc1e54
https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp232018561204
https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp232018561204
Autor:
David Svoboda, Prokop Sousedík
Publikováno v:
The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review. 78:401-418
Autor:
Prokop Sousedík
Publikováno v:
Studia Neoaristotelica. 10:109-128
Autor:
Prokop Sousedík
Publikováno v:
Studia Neoaristotelica. 5:38-50