The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science

Autor: Lukas Röseler, Leonard Kaiser, Christopher Doetsch, Noah Klett, Christian Seida, Astrid Schütz, Balazs Aczel, Nadia Adelina, Valeria Agostini, Samuel Alarie, Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir, Alaa Aldoh, Ali H. Al-Hoorie, Flavio Azevedo, Bradley J. Baker, Charlotte Lilian Barth, Julia Beitner, Cameron Brick, Hilmar Brohmer, Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar, Kai Li Chung, Jamie P. Cockcroft, Jamie Cummins, Veronica Diveica, Tsvetomira Dumbalska, Emir Efendic, Mahmoud Elsherif, Thomas Evans, Gilad Feldman, Adrien Fillon, Nico Förster, Joris Frese, Oliver Genschow, Vaitsa Giannouli, Biljana Gjoneska, Timo Gnambs, Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Christopher J. Graham, Helena Hartmann, Clove Haviva, Alina Herderich, Leon P. Hilbert, Darías Holgado, Ian Hussey, Zlatomira G. Ilchovska, Tamara Kalandadze, Veli-Matti Karhulahti, Leon Kasseckert, Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens, Alina Koppold, Max Korbmacher, Louisa Kulke, Niclas Kuper, Annalise LaPlume, Gavin Leech, Feline Lohkamp, Nigel Mantou Lou, Dermot Lynott, Maximilian Maier, Maria Meier, Maria Montefinese, David Moreau, Kellen Mrkva, Monika Nemcova, Danna Oomen, Julian Packheiser, Shubham Pandey, Frank Papenmeier, Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Yuri G. Pavlov, Zoran Pavlović, Charlotte R. Pennington, Merle-Marie Pittelkow, Willemijn Plomp, Paul E. Plonski, Ekaterina Pronizius, Andrew Adrian Pua, Katarzyna Pypno-Blajda, Manuel Rausch, Tobias R. Rebholz, Elena Richert, Jan Philipp Röer, Robert Ross, Kathleen Schmidt, Aleksandrina Skvortsova, Matthias F. J. Sperl, Alvin W. M. Tan, J. Lukas Thürmer, Aleksandra Tołopiło, Wolf Vanpaemel, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Steven Verheyen, Lukas Wallrich, Lucia Weber, Julia K. Wolska, Mirela Zaneva, Yikang Zhang

Publikováno v: Journal of Open Psychology Data, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 8-8 (2024)

In psychological science, replicability—repeating a study with a new sample achieving consistent results (Parsons et al., 2022)—is critical for affirming the validity of scientific findings. Despite its importance, replication efforts are few and

Externí odkaz: https://doaj.org/article/713c9840de3c483bbd141bbebbac950a

Agency and self-other asymmetries in perceived bias and shortcomings: Replications of the Bias Blind Spot and link to free will beliefs

Autor: Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar, Siu Kit Yeung, Ka Chai Yau, Chung Yee Cheung, Tanay Kulbhushan Agarwal, Cho Yan Joan Wong, Tanishka Pillai, Thea Natasha Thirlwell, Wing Nam Leung, Colman Tse, Yan Tung Li, Bo Ley Cheng, Hill Yan Cedar Chan, Gilad Feldman

Publikováno v: Judgment and Decision Making, Vol 16, Pp 1392-1412 (2021)

Bias Blind Spot (BBS) is the phenomenon that people tend to perceive themselves as less susceptible to biases than others. In three pre-registered experiments (overall N = 969), we replicated two experiments of the first demonstration of the phenomen

Externí odkaz: https://doaj.org/article/4107b550afac4ce09373fab784b43308

Accentuation and compatibility: Replication and extensions of Shafir (1993) to rethink choosing versus rejecting paradigms

Autor: Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar, Jasmin Weber, Sze Ying Chan, Won Young Cho, Tsz Ching Connie Chu, Bo Ley Cheng, Gilad Feldman

Publikováno v: Judgment and Decision Making, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 36-56 (2021)

We conducted a replication of Shafir (1993) who showed that people are inconsistent in their preferences when faced with choosing versus rejecting decision-making scenarios. The effect was demonstrated using an enrichment paradigm, asking subjects to

Externí odkaz: https://doaj.org/article/631e04b61a7c4ff7b9fad8f413377025

Tento výsledek nelze pro nepřihlášené uživatele zobrazit.
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.

Risky Therefore Not Beneficial: Replication and Extension of Finucane et al.'s (2000) Affect Heuristic Experiment

Autor: Emir Efendić, Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar, Cheong Shing Lee, Lok Yan Yeung, Min Ji Kim, Ching Yee Lee, Gilad Feldman

Publikováno v: Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(7), 1173-1184. SAGE Publications Inc.

Risks and benefits are negatively related in people’s minds. Finucane et al. causally demonstrated that increasing risks of a hazard leads people to judge its benefits as lower. Vice versa, increasing benefits leads people to judge its risks as low

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a13006ffadf4ed1ea55da602fe003bee
https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/c9ae2781-3f97-4b43-a0d0-be2bafccecaa