Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 16
pro vyhledávání: '"Piotr Bylica"'
Autor:
Piotr Bylica
Publikováno v:
Studia Philosophiae Christianae, Vol 56, Iss 4, Pp 179-202 (2020)
This article outlines a number of formulations of C.S. Lewis’s anti-naturalistic argument from desire. We tackle the problem of the logical validity of this argument and its weak points as characterized in the relevant literature, including objecti
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/f54fb111311e45b580adfa7b201ca330
Autor:
Piotr Bylica
Publikováno v:
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae, Vol 17, Iss 2 (2019)
Model poziomów analizy (MPA) wyróżnia pięć rodzajów twierdzeń opisowych o rzeczywistości dzieląc je przede wszystkim pod względem stopnia ich empirycznej testowalności. Celem tego artykułu jest wskazanie przy użyciu MPA odmian kreacjoniz
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/9cc5ec6ceef445a98cae52f980d40dcc
Autor:
Piotr Bylica, Dariusz Sagan
Publikováno v:
Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica, Vol 64, Iss 242, Pp 621-638 (2015)
The aim of this paper is to analyze the implications flowing from adopting methodological naturalism in science, with special emphasis on the relation between science and religion. Methodological naturalism, denying supernatural and teleological expl
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/aabae96c8b9249abab445c6a1a6ee7a5
Autor:
Piotr Bylica
Publikováno v:
Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy. 20
Using Feyerabend’s argumentation, and rephrasing of the problem in terms of the Model of Levels of Analysis, I show that a good empiricist need not be a (metaphysical or methodological) naturalist. I characterize the ideas of Alvin Plantinga and Ji
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f725da881f063663b85063af28d718f0
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2023.20.1.214
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2023.20.1.214
Autor:
Piotr Bylica
Publikováno v:
Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy. 11:29-34
In my response to Kowalski’s commentary I indicate that: 1) there is an imprecision in Kowalski’s presentation of the NOMA principle; 2) the NOMA principle is not a valid way of presenting theistic religions; 3) the argumentation adopted by Kowal
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::4f238319ab6a2ff30704318cbebc0349
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2014.11.97
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2014.11.97
Publikováno v:
Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy. 13:211-242
This text is a record of the discussion on the paper “Program badawczy SETI a teoria inteligentnego projektu” [The SETI Research Programme and the Theory of Intelligent Design] by Adam Trybus on a seminar of the Zielona Gora Local Group “Scienc
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f5b92e99110fdf5fd13404047071b7fc
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2016.13.131
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2016.13.131
Autor:
Piotr Bylica
Publikováno v:
Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy. 13:275-285
I shall show that Dr. Harris’ study of biblical scholarship is treated in a very serious manner in my paper, as it is the element identifying him as a representative of naturalistic theism (NT). NT is a position that has been recognized in the lite
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::391c9efc454a6a9f83f36a0bca622c06
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2016.13.134
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2016.13.134
Autor:
Piotr Bylica
Publikováno v:
Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy. 12:7-36
Presently, naturalistic theism is the dominant position in the debate on the relation between science and religion, defending a thesis that the conflict between science and religion is only an apparent one. Also, this version of theism accepts the na
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a1d2fdb03979fb3f60192248011560ad
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2015.12.109
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2015.12.109
Autor:
Piotr Bylica
Publikováno v:
Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy. 9:221-253
W artykule proponuję model podziału twierdzeń o rzeczywistości, różnicujący je pod względem stopnia ich empirycznego charakteru. Zaproponowany model ma ułatwiać analizę zagadnień z zakresu relacji nauki i religii. Na najwyższym poziomie
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a0720bb04778bc17825df23677fe082a
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2012.9.74
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2012.9.74
Publikováno v:
Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy. 10:17-63
This text is the record of the discussion on Adam Grobler’s paper, „Slabości eksplanacyjne teorii inteligentnego projektu” [Explanatory Weaknesses of Intelligent Design], conducted by the employees of University of Zielona Gora’s Institute o
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::69acbfb5cd07517aa859940d3f78b251
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2013.10.79
https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2013.10.79